Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Sep;14(9):611-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00490.x. Epub 2012 Jun 10.

Randomized clinical trial of local infiltration plus patient-controlled opiate analgesia vs. epidural analgesia following liver resection surgery

Erica J Revie  1 , Dermot W McKeown, John A Wilson, O James Garden, Stephen J Wigmore
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized clinical trial of local infiltration plus patient-controlled opiate analgesia vs. epidural analgesia following liver resection surgery

Erica J Revie et al. HPB (Oxford). 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: Epidural analgesia is recommended for the provision of analgesia following major abdominal surgery. Continuous local anaesthetic wound infiltration may be an effective alternative. A prospective randomized trial was undertaken to compare these two methods following open liver resection. The primary outcome was length of time required to fulfil criteria for discharge from hospital.

Methods: Patients undergoing open liver resection were randomized to receive either epidural (EP group) or local anaesthetic wound infiltration plus patient-controlled opiate analgesia (WI group) for the first 2 days postoperatively. All other care followed a standardized enhanced recovery protocol. Time to fulfil discharge criteria, pain scores, physical activity measurements and complications were recorded.

Results: Between August 2009 and July 2010, 65 patients were randomized to EP (n = 32) or WI (n = 33). The mean time required to fulfil discharge criteria was 4.5 days (range: 2.5-63.5 days) in the WI group and 6.0 days (range: 3.0-42.5 days) in the EP group (P = 0.044). During the first 48 h following surgery, pain scores were significantly lower in the EP group both at rest and on movement. Resting pain scores within both groups were rated as mild (range: 0-3). There was no significant difference between the groups in time to first mobilization or overall complication rate (48.5% in the WI group vs. 58.1% in the EP group; P = 0.443).

Conclusions: Local anaesthetic wound infiltration combined with patient-controlled opiate analgesia reduces the length of time required to fulfil criteria for discharge from hospital compared with epidural analgesia following open liver resection. Epidural analgesia provides superior analgesia, but does not confer benefits in terms of faster mobilization or recovery.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01042054.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Exclusion criteria
Figure 2
Figure 2
Enhanced recovery care plan followed by both groups following open liver resection
Figure 3
Figure 3
Criteria for discharge from hospital following open liver resection
Figure 4
Figure 4
Flow diagram illustrating patient enrolment. WC, wound catheter
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean pain scores (a) at rest (P= 0.015) and (b) on movement (P= 0.022) following open liver resection, in patients randomized to either wound catheter patient-controlled i.v. opiate analgesia or epidural analgesia. PoD, postoperative day
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hudcova J, McNicol ED, Quah CS, Lau J, Carr DB. Patient-controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesia for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD003348. - PubMed
    1. Rogers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomized trials. BMJ. 2000;321:1493–1497. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park WY, Thompson JS, Lee KK. Effect of epidural anaesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome. A randomized, controlled Veterans Affairs Cooperative study. Ann Surg. 2001;234:560–571. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rigg JR, Jamrozik K, Myles PS, Silbert BS, Peyton PJ, Parsons RW, et al. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1276–1282. - PubMed
    1. Liu SS, Wu CL. Effect of postoperative analgesia on major postoperative complications: a systemic update of the evidence. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:689–702. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data