Psycho-social outcome in liver transplanted children: beware of emotional self-assessment!
- PMID: 22883139
- PMCID: PMC3462715
- DOI: 10.1186/1824-7288-38-37
Psycho-social outcome in liver transplanted children: beware of emotional self-assessment!
Abstract
Background: Psycho-social outcome in children after liver transplantation (LT) is known to be inferior to age-related peers. Yet, when children and their parents are questioned by their nurse or physician about the child's psycho-social well-being, the answers usually are very positive. We hypothesized that patients and their parents after LT report their psycho-social well-being too enthusiastically when enquired by their personal care takers.
Inclusion criteria: LT at the Children's University Hospital of Geneva 1992-2007, age >3 years, <16 years, time after LT >2 years. Children and their parents were questioned by their well-known, familiar nurse at the annual follow up visit about their personal well-being. To allow for evaluation of answers, scores (good, medium, bad) were attributed to the different questions. 46 children were included in the study.
Results: Mean age at enquiry was 9.7 years (SD 4 years), mean time after LT was 7.5 years (SD 4.2 years). The different themes were reported as good for: parent-child relationship (83%), relationship with peers (98%), relation with siblings (39%), sport activities (54%), play activities (78%), school performance (87%), expression skills (67%), and general behavior (89%).
Conclusion: Most of our LT children and their parents consider, during a personal interview with a closely related, familiar nurse, that the child's psycho-social outcome is good. Yet, it is generally acknowledged that children after LT have negatively altered psycho-social outcomes. Thus, emotionally influenced reports about psycho-social outcome in children after LT must be looked at with care.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Family strain and its relation to psychosocial dysfunction in children and adolescents after liver transplantation.Pediatr Transplant. 2014 Dec;18(8):851-9. doi: 10.1111/petr.12367. Epub 2014 Oct 12. Pediatr Transplant. 2014. PMID: 25307019
-
Activities and participation of children with cerebral palsy: parent perspectives.Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(23):2164-73. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.999164. Epub 2015 Jan 14. Disabil Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 25586796
-
[Medical follow-up, personal experiences and everyday life of young adults after liver transplantation during childhood].Bull Acad Natl Med. 2008 Nov;192(8):1641-54; discussion 1654-6. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2008. PMID: 19445378 Review. French.
-
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. Pediatrics. 2003. PMID: 12777595
-
Functional outcomes of pediatric liver transplantation.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2003 Aug;37(2):155-60. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200308000-00014. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2003. PMID: 12883302
Cited by
-
Health-related quality of life in pediatric liver transplanted patients compared with a chronic liver disease group.Ital J Pediatr. 2013 Sep 11;39:55. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-39-55. Ital J Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 24025419 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Belli DC, Schaeppi M, Mentha G, Chardot C. Transplantations hépatiques chez l’enfant : série genevoise. Paediatrica. 2006;17(1):24–27.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials