Performance of two quantitative PCR methods for microbial source tracking of human sewage and implications for microbial risk assessment in recreational waters
- PMID: 22885746
- PMCID: PMC3457114
- DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01430-12
Performance of two quantitative PCR methods for microbial source tracking of human sewage and implications for microbial risk assessment in recreational waters
Abstract
Before new, rapid quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods for assessment of recreational water quality and microbial source tracking (MST) can be useful in a regulatory context, an understanding of the ability of the method to detect a DNA target (marker) when the contaminant source has been diluted in environmental waters is needed. This study determined the limits of detection and quantification of the human-associated Bacteroides sp. (HF183) and human polyomavirus (HPyV) qPCR methods for sewage diluted in buffer and in five ambient, Florida water types (estuarine, marine, tannic, lake, and river). HF183 was quantifiable in sewage diluted up to 10(-6) in 500-ml ambient-water samples, but HPyVs were not quantifiable in dilutions of >10(-4). Specificity, which was assessed using fecal composites from dogs, birds, and cattle, was 100% for HPyVs and 81% for HF183. Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) estimated the possible norovirus levels in sewage and the human health risk at various sewage dilutions. When juxtaposed with the MST marker detection limits, the QMRA analysis revealed that HF183 was detectable when the modeled risk of gastrointestinal (GI) illness was at or below the benchmark of 10 illnesses per 1,000 exposures, but the HPyV method was generally not sensitive enough to detect potential health risks at the 0.01 threshold for frequency of illness. The tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity in the MST methods indicates that HF183 data should be interpreted judiciously, preferably in conjunction with a more host-specific marker, and that better methods of concentrating HPyVs from environmental waters are needed if this method is to be useful in a watershed management or monitoring context.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Quantitative microbial risk assessment of microbial source tracking markers in recreational water contaminated with fresh untreated and secondary treated sewage.Environ Int. 2018 Aug;117:243-249. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 15. Environ Int. 2018. PMID: 29772486
-
Cross-Comparison of Human Wastewater-Associated Molecular Markers in Relation to Fecal Indicator Bacteria and Enteric Viruses in Recreational Beach Waters.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Mar 31;83(8):e00028-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00028-17. Print 2017 Apr 15. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017. PMID: 28159789 Free PMC article.
-
Association of fecal indicator bacteria with human viruses and microbial source tracking markers at coastal beaches impacted by nonpoint source pollution.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Sep;78(18):6423-32. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00024-12. Epub 2012 Jul 6. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012. PMID: 22773625 Free PMC article.
-
Synergy between quantitative microbial source tracking (qMST) and quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA): A review and prospectus.Environ Int. 2019 Sep;130:104703. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.051. Epub 2019 Jul 8. Environ Int. 2019. PMID: 31295713 Review.
-
Can We Swim Yet? Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Risk Assessment of Aging Sewage in Surface Waters.Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Sep 4;52(17):9634-9645. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01948. Epub 2018 Aug 20. Environ Sci Technol. 2018. PMID: 30080397
Cited by
-
Quantification of human and animal viruses to differentiate the origin of the fecal contamination present in environmental samples.Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:192089. doi: 10.1155/2013/192089. Epub 2013 May 15. Biomed Res Int. 2013. PMID: 23762826 Free PMC article.
-
Performance Evaluation of Human-Specific Viral Markers and Application of Pepper Mild Mottle Virus and CrAssphage to Environmental Water Samples as Fecal Pollution Markers in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal.Food Environ Virol. 2019 Sep;11(3):274-287. doi: 10.1007/s12560-019-09389-x. Epub 2019 May 13. Food Environ Virol. 2019. PMID: 31087275
-
Tools for interpretation of wastewater SARS-CoV-2 temporal and spatial trends demonstrated with data collected in the San Francisco Bay Area.Water Res X. 2021 Aug 1;12:100111. doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2021.100111. Epub 2021 Jul 31. Water Res X. 2021. PMID: 34373850 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating the minimum number of SARS-CoV-2 infected cases needed to detect viral RNA in wastewater: To what extent of the outbreak can surveillance of wastewater tell us?Environ Res. 2021 Apr;195:110748. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110748. Epub 2021 Jan 17. Environ Res. 2021. PMID: 33465345 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of process limit of detection and quantification variation of SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR and RT-dPCR assays for wastewater surveillance.Water Res. 2022 Apr 15;213:118132. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118132. Epub 2022 Feb 3. Water Res. 2022. PMID: 35152136 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Public Health Association 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th ed American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
-
- Bell A, et al. 2009. Factors influencing the persistence of fecal Bacteroides in stream water. J. Environ. Qual. 38:1224–1232 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources