Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct 12;287(42):35669-35677.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.357871. Epub 2012 Aug 10.

Induction of cardiac fibrosis by β-blocker in G protein-independent and G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5/β-arrestin2-dependent Signaling pathways

Affiliations

Induction of cardiac fibrosis by β-blocker in G protein-independent and G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5/β-arrestin2-dependent Signaling pathways

Michio Nakaya et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) have long been known as receptors that activate G protein-dependent cellular signaling pathways. In addition to the G protein-dependent pathways, recent reports have revealed that several ligands called "biased ligands" elicit G protein-independent and β-arrestin-dependent signaling through GPCRs (biased agonism). Several β-blockers are known as biased ligands. All β-blockers inhibit the binding of agonists to the β-adrenergic receptors. In addition to β-blocking action, some β-blockers are reported to induce cellular responses through G protein-independent and β-arrestin-dependent signaling pathways. However, the physiological significance induced by the β-arrestin-dependent pathway remains much to be clarified in vivo. Here, we demonstrate that metoprolol, a β(1)-adrenergic receptor-selective blocker, could induce cardiac fibrosis through a G protein-independent and β-arrestin2-dependent pathway. Metoprolol, a β-blocker, increased the expression of fibrotic genes responsible for cardiac fibrosis in cardiomyocytes. Furthermore, metoprolol induced the interaction between β(1)-adrenergic receptor and β-arrestin2, but not β-arrestin1. The interaction between β(1)-adrenergic receptor and β-arrestin2 by metoprolol was impaired in the G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5 (GRK5)-knockdown cells. Metoprolol-induced cardiac fibrosis led to cardiac dysfunction. However, the metoprolol-induced fibrosis and cardiac dysfunction were not evoked in β-arrestin2- or GRK5-knock-out mice. Thus, metoprolol is a biased ligand that selectively activates a G protein-independent and GRK5/β-arrestin2-dependent pathway, and induces cardiac fibrosis. This study demonstrates the physiological importance of biased agonism, and suggests that G protein-independent and β-arrestin-dependent signaling is a reason for the diversity of the effectiveness of β-blockers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Metoprolol-induced cardiac fibrosis. A, picrosirius red staining of perivascular region of left ventricles of ddY mice after treatment of saline (Control (Con)) or β-blockers (Metoprolol (Met), Propranolol (Pro), Carvedilol (Car)). Paraffin sections of hearts (3 μm thickness) were prepared from mice, to which each β-blocker was administered. The sections were stained with picrosirius red and observed under microscopy. Representative images are shown. Scale bar, 15 μm. B, quantification of collagen volume fraction from A (n = 5). **, p < 0.01. C, up-regulation of mRNA expressions of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), Periostin, Collagen 1a (Col1a), α-skeletal actin, and Ctgf (CTGF) in mouse hearts by β-blockers. The expression levels of the fibrotic genes were evaluated by real-time RT-PCR. The fold-increases were calculated by the values of saline-treated mice set as 1 (n = 3–5). **, p < 0.01. D, Masson's trichrome staining of perivascular and interstitial regions of left ventricles from saline- or metoprolol-treated C57BL/6J mice (n = 5–6). Typical images are shown. Arrows indicate the fibrotic region. Scale bar: 15 μm on perivascular images, 30 μm on interstitial images. Collagen volume fraction on each image was quantified and the data were shown below the images. *, p < 0.05. E, hemodynamic parameters (dP/dtmax or dP/dtmin) of the saline- or metoprolol-treated C57BL/6J mice. Saline or metoprolol was administered to mice for 3 months. After the administration, they were subjected to hemodynamic measurements. The parameters dP/dtmax or dP/dtmin represent the maximal rate of pressure development, maximal rate of decay of pressure, respectively. Error bars show S.E. (n = 15). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Metoprolol-induced fibrotic responses did not depend on G protein signaling. A, cAMP accumulation in HEK293 cells expressing β1-adrenergic receptors by β-blockers (10 μm) in the presence of ICI118551 (50 μm). HEK293 cells stably expressing β1-adrenergic receptor were transiently transfected with a FRET-based cAMP biosensor. After 15 min of pre-treatment with ICI118551, β-blocker stimulation was performed on the cells and the changes of the fluorescence were followed under microscopy. non, nonstimulated cell; Iso, isopreterenol; Met, metoprolol; CGP, CGP20712A; Bis, bisoprolol; ICI, ICI18,551; Pro, propranolol; Car, carvedilol; Lab, labetalol; Pin, pindolol. ΔFRET ratios were determined at 5 min after the stimulation. The experiments were repeated three times and each result was obtained from 13 to 20 cells. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. B, pertussis toxin (PTX) treatment did not influence cAMP accumulation by metoprolol. PTX treatment (100 ng/ml) was performed 16 h before the co-addition of 3-isobutyl-1-methyxanthine (IBMX) (1 mm) and β-blockers (Metoprolol, CGP-20712A) (10 μm) on HEK293 cells stably expressing β1-adrenergic receptor, and cAMP accumulation was determined by FRET using microscopy. The experiments were repeated three times and each result was obtained from 6 cells.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Metoprolol up-regulated expressions of fibrotic genes in rat neonatal cardiomyocytes but not in cardiac fibroblasts. Metoprolol-induced induction of fibrotic genes in rat neonatal cardiomyocytes (A) or cardiac fibroblasts (B) were determined (n = 3 for cardiomyocytes, and n = 8 for cardiac fibroblast). Rat neonatal cardiomyocytes or cardiac fibroblasts were stimulated with 10 μm metoprolol. The expression levels of fibrotic genes (TGF-β, Ctgf (CTGF), and Col1a (Col1a)) after the stimulation were determined by real time RT-PCR. *, p < 0.05.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Requirement of β-arrestin2 for metoprolol-induced responses. A–C, the changes in BRET ratios by metoprolol or isoproterenol stimulation for 5 min in HEK293 cells (A), H9c2 cells (B), or cardiomyocytes (C). A, HEK293 cells were transfected with β1-adrenergic receptor-Rluc and GFP2-β-arrestin1 (left panel, βArr1-β1AR) or β1-adrenergic receptor-Rluc and β-arrestin2-GFP2 (right panel, βArr2-β1AR) (n = 4). B and C, H9c2 cells (B) or rat neonatal cardiomyocytes (C) were transfected with β1-adrenergic receptor-Rluc and β-arrestin2-GFP2 (n = 3). They were harvested 48 h after the transfection, washed with PBS, and split into 96-well plates. Then, they were incubated with isoproterenol or metoprolol at the indicated concentrations for 5 min. After the incubation, Rluc substrate, DeepBlueCTM was added to a final concentration of 5 μm. BRET signal was determined by calculating the ratio of the light emitted by the GFP2 and the light emitted by RLuc. D and E, the cells were transfected with Rluc-β-arrestin2-GFP2 (n = 4 for HEK293 cells and n = 3 for H9c2 cells). Then, the changes in BRET ratios of Rluc-β-arrestin2-GFP2 were determined after metoprolol (10 μm) or isoproterenol stimulation (10 μm) for 5 min in HEK293 cells expressing β1-adrenergic receptor (D) or H9c2 cells expressing β1-adrenergic receptor (E). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Requirement of β-arrestin2 for metoprolol-induced cardiac fibrosis. A and B, cardiac fibrosis in perivascular (A) or interstitial (B) regions of left ventricles of wild type or β-arrestin2-KO mice by metoprolol. Metoprolol was orally administered to wild type or β-arrestin2-KO mice for 3 months. The degrees of their cardiac fibrosis were evaluated by picrosirius staining using paraffin sections of their hearts. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001. C, CTGF mRNA expression by metoprolol in wild type or β-arrestin2-KO mice. *, p < 0.05. Mouse heart total RNA was prepared from wild-type or β-arrestin2 knock-out mice (n = 3), which underwent metoprolol administration for 3 months. CTGF expression levels were evaluated by real time RT-PCR. D, determination of dP/dtmin of wild type or β-arrestin2-KO mice. The metoprolol-administered wild type or β-arrestin2-KO mice were subjected to hemodynamic measurements (n = 7–12). ***, p < 0.001.
FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.
Requirement of GRK5 for metoprolol-induced cardiac fibrosis. A, interaction between β1-adrenergic receptor and β-arrestin2 by metoprolol (10 μm) or isoproterenol (1 nm, 100 nm) stimulation in GRK5- or GRK6-knockdown cells (n = 4). HEK293 cells were transiently co-transfected with siRNA (control siRNA, GRK5 siRNA, or GRK6 siRNA), β1-adrenergic receptor-Rluc, and β-arrestin2-GFP2. Two days after transfection, BRET measurement was performed. *, p < 0.05. B, the changes of dP/dtmin in GRK5- or GRK6-KO mice (n = 7–14). Metoprolol was administered to wild type, GRK5-KO, or GRK6-KO mice for 3 months. After the administration, they were subjected to hemodynamic measurements. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01. C and D, cardiac fibrosis in perivascular (C) or interstitial (D) regions of left ventricles of metoprolol-treated wild type or GRK5-KO mice (n = 5). The degrees of cardiac fibrosis in metoprolol-administered wild type or GRK5-KO mice were evaluated by picrosirius staining using paraffin sections of their hearts. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001.
FIGURE 7.
FIGURE 7.
Schematic diagram depicting the model of metoprolol-mediated cardiac fibrosis. Metoprolol induces cardiac fibrosis through β1-adrenergic receptor depending on GRK5 and β-arrestin2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pierce K. L., Premont R. T., Lefkowitz R. J. (2002) Seven-transmembrane receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 639–650 - PubMed
    1. Reiter E., Lefkowitz R. J. (2006) GRKs and β-arrestins. Roles in receptor silencing, trafficking, and signaling. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 17, 159–165 - PubMed
    1. DeFea K. A. (2011) β-Arrestins as regulators of signal termination and transduction. How do they determine what to scaffold? Cell. Signal. 23, 621–629 - PubMed
    1. DeWire S. M., Ahn S., Lefkowitz R. J., Shenoy S. K. (2007) β-Arrestins and cell signaling. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 69, 483–510 - PubMed
    1. Premont R. T., Gainetdinov R. R. (2007) Physiological roles of G protein-coupled receptor kinases and arrestins. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 69, 511–534 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms