Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:959260.
doi: 10.1155/2012/959260. Epub 2012 Jul 22.

Weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy in super superobesity

Affiliations

Weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy in super superobesity

J-M Catheline et al. J Obes. 2012.

Abstract

Objective. This prospective study evaluated laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for its safety and efficiency in excess weight loss (%EWL) in super superobese patients (BMI >60 Kg/m(2)). Results. Thirty patients (33 women and 7 men) were included, with mean age of 35 years (range 18 to 59). Mean preoperative BMI was 66 Kg/m(2) (range 60 to 85). The study included one patient with complete situs inversus and 4 (14%) with previous restrictive gastric banding. The mean operative time was 120 minutes (range 80 to 220 min) and the mean hospital stay was 7.5 days (4 to 28 days). There was no postoperative mortality or need for a laparotomy conversion. Two subphrenic hematomas, one gastric fistula, and one pulmonary embolism, were the major complications. After 18 months 17 (77%) had sufficient weight loss and six had insufficient results, leading to either re-sleeve gastrectomy (3), or gastric bypass (2). Three years after the initial laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, the mean EWL was 51% (range 21 to 82). Conclusion. The laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and efficient operating procedure for treating super superobesity. In the case of insufficient weight loss, a second-stage operation like resleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass can be proposed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Decisional algorithm for the choice of revisional operation in the case of insufficient weight loss.
Figure 2
Figure 2
BMI evolution (Kg/m2).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Variation in percentage of excess weight lost (% EWL).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Weight evolution (Kg).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dresel A, Kuhn JA, McCarty TM. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese and super morbidly obese patients. American Journal of Surgery. 2004;187(2):230–232. - PubMed
    1. Fernandez AZ, Jr., De Maria EJ, Tichansky DS, et al. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for death following gastric bypass for treatement of morbid obesity. Annals of Surgery. 2004;239(5):698–703. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, Pomp A. Early experience with two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super-super obese patient. Obesity Surgery. 2003;13(6):861–864. - PubMed
    1. Catheline JM, Fysekidis M, Bihan H, Boschetto A, Dbouk R, et al. Better results in weight loss after the second gastrectomy in re-sleeve gastrectomy. Journal of Obesity and Weight Loss Therapy. 2011;1, article 107
    1. Zinzindohoué F, Chevallier JM, Douard R, et al. Laparoscopic gastric banding: a minimally invasive surgical treatment for morbid obesity: prospective study of 500 consecutive patients. Annals of Surgery. 2003;237(1):1–9. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources