Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012;41(5):621-39.
doi: 10.1080/15374416.2012.706517. Epub 2012 Aug 13.

Evaluation of a group cognitive-behavioral depression prevention program for young adolescents: a randomized effectiveness trial

Jane E Gillham  1 , Karen J Reivich, Steven M Brunwasser, Derek R Freres, Norma D Chajon, V Megan Kash-Macdonald, Tara M Chaplin, Rachel M Abenavoli, Samantha L Matlin, Robert J Gallop, Martin E P Seligman
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluation of a group cognitive-behavioral depression prevention program for young adolescents: a randomized effectiveness trial

Jane E Gillham et al. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2012.

Abstract

Depression is a common psychological problem in adolescence. Recent research suggests that group cognitive-behavioral interventions can reduce and prevent symptoms of depression in youth. Few studies have tested the effectiveness of such interventions when delivered by school teachers and counselors (as opposed to research team staff). We evaluated the effectiveness of the Penn Resiliency Program for adolescents (PRP-A), a school-based group intervention that targets cognitive behavioral risk factors for depression. We randomly assigned 408 middle school students (ages 10-15) to one of three conditions: PRP-A, PRP-AP (in which adolescents participated in PRP-A and parents were invited to attend a parent intervention component), or a school-as-usual control. Adolescents completed measures of depression and anxiety symptoms, cognitive style, and coping at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 6-month follow-up. PRP-A reduced depression symptoms relative to the school as usual control. Baseline levels of hopelessness moderated intervention effects. Among participants with average and high levels of hopelessness, PRP (A and AP) significantly improved depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, hopelessness, and active coping relative to control. Among participants with low baseline hopelessness, we found no intervention effects. PRP-AP was not more effective than PRP-A alone. We found no intervention effects on clinical levels of depression or anxiety. These findings suggest that cognitive-behavioral interventions can be beneficial when delivered by school teachers and counselors. These interventions may be most helpful to students with elevated hopelessness.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00360451.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow from recruitment through 6-month follow-up
Figure 2
Figure 2
Interaction of Condition and Hopelessness
Figure 3
Figure 3
A to E Intervention effects for subgroups with average and high versus low hopelessness A. Depression symptoms (CDI) B. Depression symptoms (RADS-2) C. Anxiety symptoms (RCMAS) D. Hopelessness (HSC) E. Active Coping (CCSC)
Figure 3
Figure 3
A to E Intervention effects for subgroups with average and high versus low hopelessness A. Depression symptoms (CDI) B. Depression symptoms (RADS-2) C. Anxiety symptoms (RCMAS) D. Hopelessness (HSC) E. Active Coping (CCSC)
Figure 3
Figure 3
A to E Intervention effects for subgroups with average and high versus low hopelessness A. Depression symptoms (CDI) B. Depression symptoms (RADS-2) C. Anxiety symptoms (RCMAS) D. Hopelessness (HSC) E. Active Coping (CCSC)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abela JRZ. The hopelessness theory of depression: A test of the diathesis-stress and causal mediation components in third and seventh grade children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2001;29:241–254. - PubMed
    1. Abela JRZ, Aydin C, Auerbach RP. Operationalizing the “vulnerability” and “stress” components of the hopelessness theory of depression: A multi-wave longitudinal study. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2006;44:1565–1583. - PubMed
    1. Abela JRZ, Aydin CM, Auerbach RP. Responses to depression in children: Reconceptualizing the relation among response styles. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2007;35:913–927. - PubMed
    1. Abela JRZ, Brozina K, Haigh EP. An examination of response styles theory of depression in third- and seventh-grade children: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2002;30:515–527. - PubMed
    1. Abela JRZ, Gagnon H, Auerbach RP. Hopelessness depression in children: An examination of the symptom component of the Hopelessness Theory. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2007;31:401–417.

Publication types

Associated data