Successful removal of football helmet face-mask clips after 1 season of use
- PMID: 22889659
- PMCID: PMC3396303
- DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.4.10
Successful removal of football helmet face-mask clips after 1 season of use
Abstract
Context: Whereas many researchers have assessed the ability to remove loop straps in traditional face-mask attachment systems after at least 1 season of use, research in which the effectiveness of the Riddell Quick Release (QR) Face Guard Attachment System clip after 1 season has been assessed is limited.
Objective: To examine the success rate of removing the QR clips after 1 season of use at the Football Championship Subdivision level. We hypothesized that 1 season of use would negatively affect the removal rate of the QR clip but repeated clip-removal trials would improve the removal rate.
Design: Retrospective, quasi-experimental design.
Setting: Controlled laboratory study.
Patients or other participants: Sixty-three football helmets from a National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I university located in western Pennsylvania used during the 2008 season were tested.
Intervention(s): Three certified athletic trainers (2 men, 1 woman; age = 31.3 ± 3.06 years, time certified = 9.42 ± 2.65 years) attempted to remove the QR clips from each helmet with the tool provided by the manufacturer. Helmets then were reassembled to allow each athletic trainer to attempt clip removal.
Main outcome measure(s): The dependent variables were total left clips removed (TCR-L), total right clips removed (TCR-R), and total clips removed (TCR). Success rate of clip removal (SRCR) also was assessed.
Results: Percentages for TCR-L, TCR-R, and TCR were 100% (189 of 189), 96.30% (182 of 189), and 98.15% (371 of 378), respectively. A paired-samples t test revealed a difference between TCR-R and TCR-L (t(188) = 2.689, P = .008, μ(d) = 0.037, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.064, 0.010). The percentage for SRCR was 96.30% (n = 182), whereas SRCR percentages for trials 1, 2, and 3 were 95.24% (n = 60), 98.41% (n = 62), and 95.24% (n = 60), respectively, and did not represent a difference (F(2,186) = 0.588, P = .56, 95% (CI) = 0.94, 0.99).
Conclusions: Our results indicated favorable and consistent success rates for QR clip removal after 1 season of use. Whereas the QR clip is an advancement in face-mask technology, continued examination of this system is required to ensure the highest level of function, allowing for effective management of the helmeted athlete.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Removal time and efficacy of Riddell Quick Release Face Guard Attachment System side clips during 1 football season.J Athl Train. 2012 Jul-Aug;47(4):421-7. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.4.07. J Athl Train. 2012. PMID: 22889658 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency face-mask removal effectiveness: a comparison of traditional and nontraditional football helmet face-mask attachment systems.J Athl Train. 2010 Nov-Dec;45(6):560-9. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-45.6.560. J Athl Train. 2010. PMID: 21062179 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The combined tool approach for face mask removal during on-field conditions.J Athl Train. 2008 Jan-Mar;43(1):14-20. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.1.14. J Athl Train. 2008. PMID: 18335008 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
On-field management of potential cervical spine injury in helmeted football players: leave the helmet on!Clin J Sport Med. 1998 Apr;8(2):124-9. doi: 10.1097/00042752-199804000-00012. Clin J Sport Med. 1998. PMID: 9641443 Review.
-
Management of the helmeted athlete with suspected cervical spine injury.Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;32(5):1331-50. doi: 10.1177/0363546504264580. Am J Sports Med. 2004. PMID: 15262662 Review.
Cited by
-
Best Practices and Current Care Concepts in Prehospital Care of the Spine-Injured Athlete in American Tackle Football March 2-3, 2019; Atlanta, GA.J Athl Train. 2020 Jun 23;55(6):545-562. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-430-19. J Athl Train. 2020. PMID: 32579669 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gastel JA, Palumbo MA, Hulstyn MJ, Fadale PD, Lucas P. Emergency removal of football equipment: a cadaveric cervical spine injury model. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32(4):411–417. - PubMed
-
- Peris MD, Donaldson WF, III, Towers J, Blanc R, Muzzonigro TS. Helmet and shoulder pad removal in suspected cervical spine injury: human control model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27(9):995–998. - PubMed
-
- Waninger KN. On-field management of potential cervical spine injury in helmeted football players: leave the helmet on! Clin J Sport Med. 1998;8(2):124–129. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous