Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul-Aug;47(4):457-66.
doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.4.09.

Frequency of use of clinical shoulder examination tests by experienced shoulder surgeons

Affiliations

Frequency of use of clinical shoulder examination tests by experienced shoulder surgeons

Aaron D Sciascia et al. J Athl Train. 2012 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Context: Health care professionals have reported and used a multitude of special tests to evaluate patients with shoulder injuries. Because of the vast array of tests, educators of health care curriculums are challenged to decide which tests should be taught.

Objective: To survey experienced shoulder specialists to identify the common clinical tests used to diagnose 9 specific shoulder injuries to determine if a core battery of tests should be taught to allied health professionals.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Descriptive survey administered via e-mail.

Patients or other participants: Of 131 active members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, 71 responded to the survey.

Main outcome measure(s): Respondents were asked to complete a survey documenting their use of clinical tests during a shoulder examination. They answered yes or no to indicate their use of 122 different tests for diagnosing 9 shoulder conditions.

Results: The average number of tests used for all pathologic conditions was 30 ± 9. The anterior apprehension and cross-body adduction tests were used by all respondents. At least 1 test was used for each of the 9 conditions listed (range = 1-7), and at least 50% of respondents used 25 tests. The tests were reviewed for valid diagnostic accuracy via the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool. High diagnostic value and a large amount of QUADAS variability have been reported in the literature for 16 of the 25 tests.

Conclusions: A small percentage (20%) of clinical tests is being used by most examiners. The 25 most common tests identified from this survey may serve as a foundation for the student's knowledge base, with the clear understanding that multiple clinical tests are used by some of the most experienced clinicians dealing with shoulder injuries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Starkey C, Brown SD, Ryan J. Examination of Orthopedic and Athletic Injuries. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis; 2010. Evidence-based practice in the diagnostic process; pp. 45–56. In. eds.
    1. Hegedus EJ, Goode A, Campbell S, et al. Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42(2):80–92. - PubMed
    1. Calvert E, Chambers GK, Regan W, Hawkins RH, Leith JM. Special physical examination tests for superior labrum anterior posterior shoulder tears are clinically limited and invalid: a diagnostic systematic review. Clin J Epidemiol. 2009;62(5):558–563. - PubMed
    1. Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Dinnes J, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PMM, Kleijnen J. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(25):1–234. i. - PubMed
    1. Magee DJ. Orthopedic Physical Assessment. 5th ed. St Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier; 2008.