Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Sep;37(9):833-7.
doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31825b2071.

FDG PET or PET/CT for detecting intramedullary and extramedullary lesions in multiple Myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

FDG PET or PET/CT for detecting intramedullary and extramedullary lesions in multiple Myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yu-Yu Lu et al. Clin Nucl Med. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of the current study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET or PET/CT for intramedullary and extramedullary lesions in multiple myeloma.

Methods: The authors conducted a systematic MEDLINE search of published articles. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each study. We estimated pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), and summary receiver operating characteristic curves in the detection of intramedullary and extramedullary lesions in multiple myeloma.

Results: Fourteen studies with a total of 395 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of FDG PET or PET/CT for the detection of extramedullary lesions in multiple myeloma were 96.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 79.6%-99.9%], 77.8% (95% CI, 40.0%-97.2%), 3.28 (95% CI, 1.29-8.32), and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.03-0.42), respectively. The pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, LR+, and LR- of FDG PET or PET/CT for the detection of intramedullary lesions in multiple myeloma were 61.1% (95% CI, 43.5%-76.9%), 94.1% (95% CI, 71.3%-99.9%), 5.73 (95% CI, 1.53-21.40), and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.28-0.65), respectively.

Conclusions: Whole-body FDG PET or PET/CT is a valuable imaging tool for the assessment of patients with multiple myeloma, especially for the appraisal of extramedullary involvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances