Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Sep 25;109(39):15716-21.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211740109. Epub 2012 Aug 13.

Generation times in wild chimpanzees and gorillas suggest earlier divergence times in great ape and human evolution

Affiliations
Review

Generation times in wild chimpanzees and gorillas suggest earlier divergence times in great ape and human evolution

Kevin E Langergraber et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Fossils and molecular data are two independent sources of information that should in principle provide consistent inferences of when evolutionary lineages diverged. Here we use an alternative approach to genetic inference of species split times in recent human and ape evolution that is independent of the fossil record. We first use genetic parentage information on a large number of wild chimpanzees and mountain gorillas to directly infer their average generation times. We then compare these generation time estimates with those of humans and apply recent estimates of the human mutation rate per generation to derive estimates of split times of great apes and humans that are independent of fossil calibration. We date the human-chimpanzee split to at least 7-8 million years and the population split between Neanderthals and modern humans to 400,000-800,000 y ago. This suggests that molecular divergence dates may not be in conflict with the attribution of 6- to 7-million-y-old fossils to the human lineage and 400,000-y-old fossils to the Neanderthal lineage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Diagram illustrating the branching pattern and timing of the splits between humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, western gorillas, and eastern gorillas. The paler shading indicates the range of split times inferred in this study. Cartoon skulls indicate approximate age of the indicated fossil remains, but do not imply that these fossils were necessarily on those ancestral lineages or that entire crania actually exist for these forms.

Comment in

References

    1. Sarich VM, Wilson AC. Immunological time scale for hominid evolution. Science. 1967;158:1200–1203. - PubMed
    1. Uzzell T, Pilbeam D. Phyletic divergence dates of hominoid primates: A comparison of fossil and molecular data. Evolution. 1971;25:615–635. - PubMed
    1. Burgess R, Yang Z. Estimation of hominoid ancestral population sizes under Bayesian coalescent models incorporating mutation rate variation and sequencing errors. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:1979–1994. - PubMed
    1. Dutheil JY, et al. Ancestral population genomics: The coalescent hidden Markov model approach. Genetics. 2009;183:259–274. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hobolth A, Christensen OF, Mailund T, Schierup MH. Genomic relationships and speciation times of human, chimpanzee, and gorilla inferred from a coalescent hidden Markov model. PLoS Genet. 2007;3:e7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types