Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011:29:113-32.
doi: 10.1891/0739-6686.29.113.

Newborn screening: ethical, legal, and social implications

Affiliations
Review

Newborn screening: ethical, legal, and social implications

Rebecca Anderson et al. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2011.

Abstract

Newborn dried blood spot screening (NBS) is a core public health service and is the largest application of genetic testing in the United States. NBS is conducted by state public health departments to identify infants with certain genetic, metabolic, and endocrine disorders. Screening is performed in the first few days of life through blood testing. Several drops of blood are taken from the baby's heel and placed on a filter paper card. The dried blood, on the filter cards, is sent from the newborn nursery to the state health department laboratory, or a commercial partner, where the blood is analyzed. Scientific and technological advances have lead to a significant expansion in the number of tests-from an average of 6 to more than 50--and there is a national trend to further expand the NBS program. This rapid expansion has created significant ethical, legal, and social challenges for the health care system and opportunity for scholarly inquiry to address these issues. The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of the NBS programs and to provide an in-depth examination of two significant concerns raised from expanded newborn screening, specifically false-positives and lack of information for parents. Implications for nursing research in managing these ethical dilemmas are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2000). Serving the family from birth to the medical home. Newborn screening: A blueprint for the future—A call for a national agenda on state newborn screening programs. Pediatrics, 106(2, Pt. 2), 389–422. - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2006). AAP endores newborn screening report from the American College of Medical Genetics. Retrieved from http://www.medicalhomeinfo.org/screening/Screen Materials/AAP Endorses A...
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics ad hoc task force on definition of the medical home: The medical home. (1992). Pediatrics, 90(5), 774. - PubMed
    1. American College of Medical Genetics. (2005). Newborn screening: Toward a more uniform panel and system. Retrieved from www.acmg.net/resources/policies/NBS/NBS-sections.htm
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. (2011). Committee Opinion No. 481: Newborn screening. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 117(3), 762–765. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821478a0 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms