Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 14:11:98.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-98.

The effects of postprandial glucose and insulin levels on postprandial endothelial function in subjects with normal glucose tolerance

Affiliations

The effects of postprandial glucose and insulin levels on postprandial endothelial function in subjects with normal glucose tolerance

Kazunari Suzuki et al. Cardiovasc Diabetol. .

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that postprandial hyperglycemia attenuates brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in prediabetic patients, in diabetic patients, and even in normal subjects. We have previously reported that postprandial hyperinsulinemia also attenuates FMD. In the present study we evaluated the relationship between different degrees of postprandial attenuation of FMD induced by postprandial hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia and differences in ingested carbohydrate content in non-diabetic individuals.

Methods: Thirty-seven healthy subjects with no family history of diabetes were divided into 3 groups: a 75-g oral glucose loading group (OG group) (n = 14), a test meal group (TM group) (n = 12; 400 kcal, carbohydrate content 40.7 g), and a control group (n = 11). The FMD was measured at preload (FMD0) and at 60 minutes (FMD60) and 120 (FMD120) minutes after loading. Plasma glucose (PG) and immunoreactive insulin (IRI) levels were determined at preload (PG0, IRI0) and at 30 (PG30, IRI30), 60 (PG60, IRI60), and 120 (PG120, IRI120) minutes after loading.

Result: Percentage decreases from FMD0 to FMD60 were significantly greater in the TM group (-21.19% ± 17.90%; P < 0.001) and the OG group (-17.59% ± 26.64%) than in the control group (6.46% ± 9.17%; P < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed between the TM and OG groups. In contrast, the percentage decrease from FMD0 to FMD120 was significantly greater in the OG group (-18.91% ± 16.58%) than in the control group (6.78% ± 11.43%; P < 0.001) or the TM group (5.22% ± 37.22%; P < 0.05), but no significant difference was observed between the control and TM groups. The FMD60 was significantly correlated with HOMA-IR (r = -0.389; P < 0.05). In contrast, FMD120 was significantly correlated with IRI60 (r = -0.462; P < 0.05) and the AUC of IRI (r = -0.468; P < 0.05). Furthermore, the percentage change from FMD0 to FMD120 was significantly correlated with the CV of PG (r = 0.404; P < 0.05), IRI60 (r = 0.401; p < 0.05) and the AUC of IRI (r = 0.427; P < 0.05). No significant correlation was observed between any other FMDs and glucose metabolic variables.

Conclusion: Differences in the attenuation of postprandial FMD induced by different postprandial insulin levels may occur a long time postprandially but not shortly after a meal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in PG (A), IRI (B), and FMD (C) in the TM, OG, and control groups. #P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 vs. PG or IRI in the TM group, €P < 0.05 vs. FMD0 in the OG group, $P < 0.01 vs. FMD0 and FMD120 in the TM group,*P < 0.05 vs. FMD60 of the control group, \P < 0.05 vs. FMD120 in the TM and control groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage changes in FMD in the control, TM, and OG groups. From FMD0 to FMD 60: 100 × (FMD60-FMD0)/FMD0. From FMD0 to FMD120: 100 × (FMD120-FMD0)/FMD0. TM group: test meal group, OG group: 75-g oral glucose loading group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The DECODE study group on behalf of the European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetic Association diagnostic criteria. Lancet. 1999;354:617–621. - PubMed
    1. Ceriello A, Hanefeld M, Leiter L, Monnier L, Moses A, Owens D. Postprandial glucose regulation and diabetic complications. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2090–2095. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.19.2090. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tominaga M, Igarashi K, Eguchi H, Kato T, Manaka H, Sekikawa A. Impaired glucose tolerance is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, but not impaired fasting glucose: the Funagata Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:920–924. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.6.920. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hanefeld M, Kehler C, Henkel E, Fuecker K, Schaper F, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T. Post-challenge hyperglycemia relates more strongly than fasting hyperglycemia with carotid-intima-media thickness: the RIAD study. Diabet Med. 2000;17:835–840. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00408.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Widlansky ME, Gokce N, Keaney JF, Vita JA. The clinical implications of endothelial dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1149–1160. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00994-X. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms