Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May-Jun;47(3):247-56.
doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.3.10.

Glenohumeral rotational motion and strength and baseball pitching biomechanics

Affiliations

Glenohumeral rotational motion and strength and baseball pitching biomechanics

Wendy J Hurd et al. J Athl Train. 2012 May-Jun.

Abstract

Context: Addressing loss of shoulder range of motion and rotator cuff weakness in injury-prevention programs might be an effective strategy for preventing throwing arm injuries in baseball pitchers. However, the influence of these clinical measures on pitching biomechanics is unclear.

Objective: To evaluate the relationships among clinical measures of shoulder rotational motion and strength and 3-dimensional pitching biomechanics and to evaluate the presence of coupling between the shoulder and the elbow during pitching to provide insight into the influence of clinical shoulder characteristics on elbow biomechanics.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Biomechanics laboratory.

Patients or other participants: A total of 27 uninjured male high school baseball pitchers (age = 16 ± 1.1 years, height = 183 ± 7 cm, mass = 83 ± 12 kg).

Main outcome measure(s): Clinical measures included shoulder internal- and external-rotation range of motion and peak isometric internal- and external-rotator strength. Three-dimensional upper extremity biomechanics were assessed as participants threw from an indoor pitching mound to a target at regulation distance. Linear regressions were used to assess the influence of clinical measures on the peak shoulder internal and external rotation moments and the peak elbow-adduction moment.

Results: We found a positive relationship between clinically measured internal-rotator strength and shoulder external-rotation moment (R(2) = 0.181, P = .04) during pitching. We also noted an inverse relationship between clinically measured external-rotation motion and the elbow-adduction moment (R(2) = 0.160, P = .04) and shoulder internal-rotation moment (R(2) = 0.250, P = .008) during pitching. We found a positive relationship between peak shoulder internal-rotation moment and the peak elbow-adduction moment (R(2) = 0.815, P < .001) during pitching.

Conclusions: This study provides insight into the effects of shoulder strength and motion on pitching biomechanics and how these clinical measures might contribute to throwing arm injuries in the baseball pitcher. A relationship also was identified between peak shoulder and elbow moments in the throwing arm during pitching, providing biomechanical support for addressing clinical shoulder characteristics as a potential strategy for preventing elbow injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant positioning. A, Internal rotation strength testing. B, External rotation strength testing. Reprinted with permission from Hurd WJ, Kaplan KM, ElAttrache NS, Jobe FW, Morrey BF, Kaufman KR. A profile of glenohumeral internal and external rotation motion in the uninjured high school baseball pitcher, part II: strength. J Athl Train. 2011;46(3):289–295.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Marker placement. A, Anterior view. B, posterior view.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Linear regression analysis between shoulder external-rotation range of motion and the peak elbow-adduction moment (R2  =  0.160, P  =  .04).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Linear regression analysis between shoulder external-rotation range of motion and the peak shoulder internal-rotation moment (R2  =  0.250, P  =  .08).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Linear regression analysis between shoulder internal-rotator strength and the peak shoulder external-rotation moment (R2  =  0.181, P  =  .04).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Linear regression analysis between the peak shoulder internal-rotation moment and the peak elbow-adduction moment (R2  =  0.815, P < .001).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rechel JA, Yard EE, Comstock RD. An epidemiologic comparison of high school sports injuries sustained in practice and competition. J Athl Train. 2008;43(2):197–204. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collins CL, Comstock RD. Epidemiological features of high school baseball injuries in the United States, 2005–2007. Pediatrics. 2008;121(6):1181–1187. - PubMed
    1. Wilk KE, Obma P, Simpson CD, Cain EL, Dugas JR, Andrews JR. Shoulder injuries in the overhead athlete. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(2):38–54. - PubMed
    1. Wilk KE, Reinold MM, Andrews JR. Rehabilitation of the thrower's elbow. Clin Sports Med. 2004;23(4):765–801, xii. - PubMed
    1. Lyman S, Fleisig GS, Andrews JR, Osinski ED. Effect of pitch type, pitch count, and pitching mechanics on risk of elbow and shoulder pain in youth baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(4):463–468. - PubMed

Publication types