Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;38(9):1275-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 Jul 7.

The effect of tissue inhibitors on the antibacterial activity of chitosan nanoparticles and photodynamic therapy

Affiliations

The effect of tissue inhibitors on the antibacterial activity of chitosan nanoparticles and photodynamic therapy

Annie Shrestha et al. J Endod. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Newer antibacterial alternatives such as chitosan nanoparticles (CSnps) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) have been investigated to achieve effective root canal disinfection. The current study aims to assess the effect of various tissue inhibitors such as dentin, dentin matrix, pulp tissue, bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPSs), and bovine serum albumin (BSA) on the antibacterial activity of CSnps and PDT.

Methods: The antibacterial effect of CSnps and PDT using photosensitizers, rose bengal (RB), and methylene blue (MB) were tested on planktonic Enterococcus faecalis American Type Culture Collection 29212 with or without pretreatment using different tissue inhibitors for an hour. Bacterial survival was assessed after 1, 8, and 24 hours of incubation with CSnps and after PDT using RB and MB.

Results: Pulp and BSA inhibited the antibacterial effect of CSnps significantly (P < .05). The antibacterial effect of CSnps was not affected by dentin, dentin matrix, or LPSs. The antibacterial activity of PDT using MB and RB was inhibited in a decreasing order by dentin matrix, BSA, pulp, dentin, and LPSs (P < .05). The effect of tissue inhibitors was higher in the case of PDT with RB. Depending on the antibacterial mechanism of CSnps and PDT, different inhibitory patterns were observed with different tissue inhibitors.

Conclusions: The tissue inhibitors existing within the root canal affected the antibacterial activity of CSnps and PDT at varying degrees. Further research is required to enhance their antimicrobial efficacy in an endodontic environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms