Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Oct;25(5):609-13.
doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328357b0d9.

Myotonic dystrophy: is a narrow focus obscuring the rest of the field?

Affiliations
Review

Myotonic dystrophy: is a narrow focus obscuring the rest of the field?

Mani S Mahadevan. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The myotonic dystrophies (DM1 and DM2) are the paradigm for RNA toxicity in disease pathogenesis. The emphasis of this review will be on recent developments and issues in understanding the pathogenesis of DM1 and how this is driving the accelerated pace of translational and therapeutic developments.

Recent findings: RNA toxicity in myotonic dystrophy is now associated with bi-directional antisense transcription, dysregulation of microRNAs and potentially non-ATG-mediated translation of homopolymeric toxic proteins. The role of other RNA-binding proteins beyond MBNL1 and CUGBP1, such as Staufen 1 and DDX5, are being identified and studied with respect to their role in myotonic dystrophy. New functions for MBNL1 in miR-1 biogenesis might have a clinically relevant role in myotonic dystrophy cardiac conduction defects and pathology. Advances are being made in identifying and characterizing small molecules with the potential to disrupt CUG-MBNL1 interactions.

Summary: Mechanisms of RNA toxicity are moving beyond a simplistic 'foci-centric' view of DM1 pathogenesis as a spliceopathy due to MBNL1 sequestration. Therapeutic development for myotonic dystrophy is moving rapidly with the development of antisense and small molecule therapies. Clinically, significant emphasis is being placed on biomarker discovery and outcome measures as an essential prelude to clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Mathieu J, Allard P, Potvin L, et al. A 10-year study of mortality in a cohort of patients with myotonic dystrophy. Neurology. 1999;52:1658–1662. - PubMed
    1. Ranum LP, Day JW. Myotonic dystrophy: clinical and molecular parallels between myotonic dystrophy type 1 and type 2. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2002;2:465–470. - PubMed
    1. Mahadevan M, Tsilfidis C, Sabourin L, et al. Myotonic dystrophy mutation: an unstable CTG repeat in the 3′ untranslated region of the gene. Science. 1992;255:1253–1255. - PubMed
    1. Liquori CL, Ricker K, Moseley ML, et al. Myotonic dystrophy type 2 caused by a CCTG expansion in intron 1 of ZNF9. Science. 2001;293:864–867. - PubMed
    1. Tsilfidis C, MacKenzie AE, Mettler G, et al. Correlation between CTG trinucleotide repeat length and frequency of severe congenital myotonic dystrophy. Nat Genet. 1992;1:192–195. - PubMed

Publication types