Voice gender differences and separation of simultaneous talkers in cochlear implant users with residual hearing
- PMID: 22894312
- DOI: 10.1121/1.4737137
Voice gender differences and separation of simultaneous talkers in cochlear implant users with residual hearing
Abstract
Perception of a target voice in the presence of a competing talker, of same or different gender as the target, was investigated in cochlear implant users, in implant-alone and bimodal (acoustic hearing in the non-implanted ear) conditions. Recordings of two male and two female talkers acted as targets and maskers, to investigate whether bimodal benefit increased for different compared to same gender target/maskers due to increased ability to perceive and utilize fundamental frequency and spectral-shape differences. In both listening conditions participants showed benefit of target/masker gender difference. There was an overall bimodal benefit, which was independent of target/masker gender difference.
Similar articles
-
Perception of voice cues and speech-in-speech by children with prelingual single-sided deafness and a cochlear implant.Hear Res. 2024 Dec;454:109133. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109133. Epub 2024 Oct 17. Hear Res. 2024. PMID: 39546877
-
Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.Hear Res. 2017 Jul;350:226-234. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 11. Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 28527538
-
Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.Int J Audiol. 2011 Aug;50(8):498-502. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.576274. Epub 2011 Jun 23. Int J Audiol. 2011. PMID: 21696330 Free PMC article.
-
Plasticity in bilateral superior temporal cortex: Effects of deafness and cochlear implantation on auditory and visual speech processing.Hear Res. 2017 Jan;343:138-149. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 26. Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 27473501 Review.
-
Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing.Hear Res. 2011 Nov;281(1-2):65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 May 14. Hear Res. 2011. PMID: 21605648 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of age and duration of deafness on Mandarin speech understanding in competing speech by normal-hearing and cochlear implant children.J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Aug;144(2):EL131. doi: 10.1121/1.5051051. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018. PMID: 30180674 Free PMC article.
-
Bilateral and bimodal cochlear implant listeners can segregate competing speech using talker sex cues, but not spatial cues.JASA Express Lett. 2021 Jan;1(1):014401. doi: 10.1121/10.0003049. JASA Express Lett. 2021. PMID: 33521793 Free PMC article.
-
No Evidence That Music Training Benefits Speech Perception in Hearing-Impaired Listeners: A Systematic Review.Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:2331216520985678. doi: 10.1177/2331216520985678. Trends Hear. 2021. PMID: 33634750 Free PMC article.
-
The role of continuous low-frequency harmonicity cues for interrupted speech perception in bimodal hearing.J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Apr;139(4):1747. doi: 10.1121/1.4945747. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016. PMID: 27106322 Free PMC article.
-
Masking Effects in the Perception of Multiple Simultaneous Talkers in Normal-Hearing and Cochlear Implant Listeners.Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216520916106. doi: 10.1177/2331216520916106. Trends Hear. 2020. PMID: 32324486 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical