Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD007980.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007980.pub2.

Email for communicating results of diagnostic medical investigations to patients

Barbara Meyer  1 , Helen Atherton, Prescilla Sawmynaden, Josip Car
Affiliations

Email for communicating results of diagnostic medical investigations to patients

Barbara Meyer et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: As medical care becomes more complex and the ability to test for conditions grows, pressure on healthcare providers to convey increasing volumes of test results to patients is driving investigation of alternative technological solutions for their delivery. This review addresses the use of email for communicating results of diagnostic medical investigations to patients.

Objectives: To assess the effects of using email for communicating results of diagnostic medical investigations to patients, compared to SMS/ text messaging, telephone communication or usual care, on outcomes, including harms, for health professionals, patients and caregivers, and health services.

Search methods: We searched: the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 1 2010), MEDLINE (OvidSP) (1950 to January 2010), EMBASE (OvidSP) (1980 to January 2010), PsycINFO (OvidSP) (1967 to January 2010), CINAHL (EbscoHOST) (1982 to February 2010), and ERIC (CSA) (1965 to January 2010). We searched grey literature: theses/dissertation repositories, trials registers and Google Scholar (searched July 2010). We used additional search methods: examining reference lists and contacting authors.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series studies of interventions using email for communicating results of any diagnostic medical investigations to patients, and taking the form of 1) unsecured email 2) secure email or 3) web messaging. All healthcare professionals, patients and caregivers in all settings were considered.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed the titles and abstracts of retrieved citations. No studies were identified for inclusion. Consequently, no data collection or analysis was possible.

Main results: No studies met the inclusion criteria, therefore there are no results to report on the use of email for communicating results of diagnostic medical investigations to patients.

Authors' conclusions: In the absence of included studies, we can draw no conclusions on the effects of using email for communicating results of diagnostic medical investigations to patients, and thus no recommendations for practice can be stipulated. Further well-designed research should be conducted to inform practice and policy for communicating patient results via email, as this is a developing area.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

1
1
Flow diagram illustrating search results.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007980

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

Additional references

Abbott 2002
    1. Abbott KC, Mann S, DeWitt D, Youngblood SL, Kennedy S, Poropatich RK. Physician‐to‐physician consultation via electronic mail: The Walter Reed Army Medical Center ask a doc system. Military Medicine 2002;167(3):200‐4. - PubMed
Adamson 2010
    1. Adamson SC, Bachman JW. Pilot study of providing online care in a primary care setting. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2010;85(8):704‐10. - PMC - PubMed
Alderson 2002
    1. Alderson P, Green S. Issues related to the unit of analysis. Cochrane Collaboration Open Learning Material. http://www.cochrane‐net.org/openlearning/html/modA2.htm 2002.
Anand 2005
    1. Anand SG, Feldman MJ, Geller DS, Bisbee A, Bauchner H. Content analysis of e‐mail communication between primary care providers and parents. Pediatrics 2005;115(5):1283‐8. - PubMed
Atherton 2009a
    1. Atherton H, Car J, Meyer B. Email for the provision of information on disease prevention and health promotion. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007982] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Atherton 2009b
    1. Atherton H, Car J, Meyer B, Majeed A. Email for clinical communication between healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007979] - DOI - PubMed
Atherton 2009c
    1. Atherton H, Car J, Meyer B. Email for clinical communication between patients/caregivers and healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007978] - DOI
Atherton 2012
    1. Atherton H, Sawmynaden P, Meyer B, Car J. Email for the coordination of healthcare appointments and attendance reminders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue in press. - PMC - PubMed
Bitter 2000
    1. Bitter J. E‐mail in medical practice: legal and ethical concerns. Quality Risk Cost Advisor 2000;16(3):1‐8. - PubMed
Boohaker 1996
    1. Boohaker EA, Ward RE, Uman JE, McCarthy BD. Patient notification and follow‐up of abnormal test results. A physician survey. Archives of Internal Medicine 1996;156(3):327‐31. - PubMed
Car 2004a
    1. Car J, Sheikh A. Email consultations in health care: 1. scope and effectiveness. BMJ 2004;329(7463):435‐38. - PMC - PubMed
Car 2004b
    1. Car J, Sheikh A. Email consultations in health care. 2. acceptability and safe application. BMJ 2004;329:439‐42. - PMC - PubMed
Car 2008a
    1. Car J, Black A, Anandan C, Cresswell K, Pagliari C, McKinstry B, et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of healthcare. http://www1.imperial.ac.uk/resources/4565EF18‐662B‐448B‐90C2‐E7372B4C2E09/ 2008. - PMC - PubMed
Castren 2005
    1. Castren J, Niemi M, Virjo I. Use of email for patient communication in student health care: a cross‐sectional study. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making 2005;5(1):2. - PMC - PubMed
Couchman 2001
    1. Couchman GR, Forjuoh SN, Rascoe TG. E‐mail communications in family practice: what do patients expect?. Journal of Family Practice 2001;50(5):414‐8. - PubMed
Couchman 2005
    1. Couchman GR, Forjuoh SN, Rascoe TG, Reis MD, Koehler B, Walsum KL. E‐mail communications in primary care: what are patients' expectations for specific test results?. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2005;74(1):21‐30. - PubMed
Craig 2008
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655. - PMC - PubMed
Dixon 2010
    1. Dixon RF. Enhancing primary care through online communication. Health Affairs 2010;29(7):1364‐9. - PubMed
Freed 2003
    1. Freed DH. Patient‐physician e‐mail: passion or fashion?. Health Care Management 2003;22(3):265‐74. - PubMed
Fridsma 1994
    1. Fridsma DB, Ford P, Altman R. A survey of patient access to electronic mail: attitudes, barriers, and opportunities. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1994:15‐19. - PMC - PubMed
Gaster 2003
    1. Gaster B, Knight CL, DeWitt DE, Sheffield JV, Assefi NP, Buchwald D. Physicians' use of and attitudes toward electronic mail for patient communication. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2003;18(5):385‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Goldman 2006
    1. Goldman RD, Macpherson A. Internet health information use and e‐mail access by parents attending a paediatric emergency department. Emergency Medicine Journal 2006;23(5):345‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Goodyear‐Smith 2005
    1. Goodyear‐Smith F, Wearn A, Everts H, Huggard P, Halliwell J. Pandora's electronic box: GPs reflect upon email communication with their patients. Informatics in Primary Care 2005;13(3):195‐202. - PubMed
Gordon 2003
    1. Gordon C, Krimholtz M. E‐mail and patients: a medicolegal minefield. Lancet 2003;362(9397):1768. - PubMed
Gurol‐Urganci 2012
    1. Gurol‐Urganci I, Jongh T, Vodopivec‐Jamsek V, Car J, Atun R. Mobile phone messaging for communicating results of medical investigations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007456.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Harris 2001
    1. Harris Interactive. New data show internet, website and email usage by physicians all increasing. www.harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletter/healthnews/HI_HealthCareNews20... 2001.
Hassol 2004
    1. Hassol A, Walker JM, Kidder D, Rokita K, Young D, Pierdon S, et al. Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2004;11(6):505‐13. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2008
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. www.cochrane‐handbook.org 2008.
Hobbs 2003
    1. Hobbs J, Wald J, Jagannath YS, Kittler A, Pizziferri L, Volk LA, et al. Opportunities to enhance patient and physician e‐mail contact. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003;70(1):1‐9. - PubMed
Houston 2003
    1. Houston TK, Sands DZ, Nash BR, Ford DE. Experiences of physicians who frequently use e‐mail with patients. Health Communication 2003;15(4):515‐25. - PubMed
Katz 2003
    1. Katz SJ, Moyer CA, Cox DT, Stern DT. Effect of a triage‐based E‐mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2003;18:736‐44. - PMC - PubMed
Katz 2004a
    1. Katz SJ, Moyer CA. The emerging role of online communication between patients and their providers. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2004;19:978‐83. - PMC - PubMed
Katz 2004b
    1. Katz SJ, Nissan N, Moyer CA. Crossing the digital divide: evaluating online communication between patients and their providers. The American Journal of Managed Care 2004;10:593‐98. - PubMed
Katzen 2005
    1. Katzen C, Solan MJ, Dicker AP. E‐mail and oncology: a survey of radiation oncology patients and their attitudes to a new generation of health communication. Prostate Cancer & Prostatic Diseases 2005;8(2):189‐93. - PubMed
Keren 2003
    1. Keren R, Muret‐Wagstaff S, Goldmann DA, Mandl KD. Notifying emergency department patients of negative test results: pitfalls of passive communication. Paediatric Emergency Care 2003;19(4):226‐30. - PubMed
Khunti 2011
    1. Khunti K, Walker N, Sattar N, Davies M. Unanswered questions over NHS health checks. British Medical Journal 2011;342:c6312. - PubMed
Kittler 2004
    1. Kittler AF, Carlson GL, Harris C, Lippincott M, Pizziferri L, Volk LA, et al. Primary care physician attitudes towards using a secure web‐based portal designed to facilitate electronic communication with patients. Informatics in Primary Care 2004;3:129‐38. - PubMed
Kleiner 2002
    1. Kleiner KD, Akers R, Burke BL, Werner EJ. Parent and physician attitudes regarding electronic communication in pediatric practices. Pediatrics 2002;109(5):740‐4. - PubMed
Kummervold 2004
    1. Kummervold PE, Trondsen M, Andreassen H, Gammon D, Hjortdahl P. Patient‐physician interaction over the internet. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening 2004;124(20):2633‐6. - PubMed
Leong 2005
    1. Leong SL, Gingrich D, Lewis PR, Mauger DT, George JH. Enhancing doctor‐patient communication using email: a pilot study. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 2005;18(3):180‐8. - PubMed
Liederman 2003
    1. Liederman EM, Morefield CS. Web messaging: a new tool for patient‐physician communication. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2003;10(3):260‐70. - PMC - PubMed
Liederman 2005
    1. Liederman EM, Lee JC, Baquero VH, Seites PG. The impact of patient‐physician Web messaging on provider productivity. Journal of Healthcare Information Management 2005;20:52‐7. - PubMed
Lin 2005
    1. Lin CT, Wittevrongel L, Moore L, Beaty BL, Ross SE. An Internet‐basedpatient‐provider communication system: randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2005;7(4):e47. - PMC - PubMed
Mandl 1998
    1. Mandl KD, Kohane IS, Brandt AM. Electronic patient‐physician communication: problems and promise. Annals of Internal Medicine 1998;129(6):495‐500. - PubMed
Medem 2007
    1. Medem Inc. eRisk Working Group for Healthcare's Guidelines for Online Communication. http://www.medem.com/phy/phy_eriskguidelines.cfm 2007.
Moyer 1999
    1. Moyer CA, Stern DT, Katz SJ, Fendrick AM. "We got mail": electronic communication between physicians and patients. American Journal of Managed Care 1999;5(12):1513‐22. - PubMed
Moyer 2002
    1. Moyer CA, Stern DT, Dobias KS, Cox DT, Katz SJ. Bridging the electronic divide: patient and provider perspectives on e‐mail communication in primary care. American Journal of Managed Care 2002;8(5):427‐33. - PubMed
Neill 1994
    1. Neill RA, Mainous AG III, Clark JR, Hagen MD. The utility of electronic mail as a medium for patient‐physician communication. Archives of Family Medicine 1994;3(3):268‐71. - PubMed
Neville 2004
    1. Neville RG, Marsden W, McCowan C, Pagliari C, Mullen H, Fannin A. Email consultations in general practice. Informatics in Primary Care 2004;12(4):207‐14. - PubMed
OECD 2006
    1. Projecting OECD health and long‐term health care expenditures; what are the main drivers?. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/7/36085940.pdf2006.
Pew 2005
    1. The Pew Internet & American Life Project. Generations online. www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Generations_Memo.pdf (accessed 10 Aug 2007).
Podichetty 2004
    1. Podichetty V, Penn D. The progressive roles of electronic medicine: benefits, concerns, and costs. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 2004;328(2):94‐9. - PubMed
Ross 2004
    1. Ross SE, Moore LA, Earnest MA, Wittevrongel L, Lin C. Providing a web‐based online medical record with electronic communication capabilities to patients with congestive heart failure: randomized trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2004;6:e12. - PMC - PubMed
Ryan 2007
    1. Ryan R, Hill S, Broclain D, Horey D, Oliver S, Prictor M, Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group. Study Quality Guide. www.latrobe.edu.au/cochrane/resources.html (accessed Dec 2008) 2007.
Stalberg 2008
    1. Stalberg P, Yeh M, Ketteridge G, Delbridge H, Delbridge L. E‐mail access and improved communication between patient and surgeon. Archives of Surgery 2008;143(2):164‐9. - PubMed
Swartzendruber 2010
    1. Swartzendruber A, Zenilman JM. A national strategy to improve sexual health. JAMA 2010;304(9):1005‐6. - PubMed
TechWeb Network 2008
    1. TechWeb Network. TechWeb Encylopedia. http://www.techweb.com/encyclopedia 2008.
Virji 2006
    1. Virji A, Yarnall KS, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Scannell MA, Gradison M, et al. Use of email in a family practice setting: opportunities and challenges in patient‐ and physician‐initiated communication. BMC Medicine 2006;4:18. - PMC - PubMed
Zhou 2010
    1. Zhou YY, Kanter MH, Wang JJ, Garrido T. Improved quality at Kaiser Permanente through e‐mail between physicians and patients. Health Affairs 2010;29(7):1370‐5. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Meyer 2009
    1. Meyer B, Car J, Atherton H, McKinstry B. Email for communicating results of diagnostic medical investigations to patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007980] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources