Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Apr;56(2):542-52.
doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0100). Epub 2012 Aug 15.

Alternative tense and agreement morpheme measures for assessing grammatical deficits during the preschool period

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Alternative tense and agreement morpheme measures for assessing grammatical deficits during the preschool period

Allison Gladfelter et al. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: P. A. Hadley and H. Short (2005) developed a set of measures designed to assess the emerging diversity and productivity of tense and agreement (T/A) morpheme use by 2-year-olds. The authors extended 2 of these measures to the preschool years to evaluate their utility in distinguishing children with specific language impairment (SLI) from their typically developing (TD) peers.

Method: Spontaneous speech samples from 55 children (25 with SLI, 30 TD) at 2 different age levels (4;0-4;6 [years;months] and 5;0-5;6) were analyzed, using a traditional T/A morphology composite that assessed accuracy, and the Hadley and Short measures of Tense Marker Total (assessing diversity of T/A morpheme use) and Productivity Score (assessing productivity of major T/A categories).

Results: All 3 measures showed acceptable levels of sensitivity and specificity. In addition, similar differences in levels of productivity across T/A categories were seen in the TD and SLI groups.

Conclusion: The Tense Marker Total and Productivity Score measures seem to have considerable utility for preschool-age children, in that they provide information about specific T/A morphemes and major T/A categories that are not distinguished using the traditional composite measure. The findings are discussed within the framework of the gradual morphosyntactic learning account.

Keywords: assessment; language; language disorders; morphology; specific language impairment; syntax.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean tense/agreement category productivity scores with 95% confidence intervals for the children with SLI and their TD peers, collapsed across younger and older age groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bedore L, Leonard L. Specific language impairment and grammatical morphology: A discriminant function analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 1998;41:1185–1192. - PubMed
    1. Bishop DVM, Adams C, Norbury CF. Distinct genetic influences on grammar and phonological short-term memory deficits: Evidence from 6-year-old twins. Genes, Brain & Behavior. 2006;5:158–169. - PubMed
    1. Bergemeister B, Blum L, Lorge I. Columbia Mental Maturity Scale. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1972.
    1. Dollaghan C. The handbook for evidence-based practice in communication disorders. Baltimore, MD: Brookes; 2007.
    1. Finneran D, Francis A, Leonard L. Sustained attention in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2009;52:915–929. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources