Recent skin self-examination and doctor visits in relation to melanoma risk and tumour depth
- PMID: 22897437
- PMCID: PMC3579004
- DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12003
Recent skin self-examination and doctor visits in relation to melanoma risk and tumour depth
Erratum in
- Br J Dermatol. 2013 Jun;168(6):1375
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the potential benefit of skin self-examination for melanoma prevention and early detection.
Objectives: To determine whether skin self-examination is associated with reduced melanoma risk, self-detection of tumours, and reduced risk of deeper melanomas.
Methods: We used data from a population-based case-control study (423 cases, 678 controls) to assess recent skin self-examination in relation to self-detection, melanoma risk and tumour depth ( ≤1 mm; > 1 mm). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for associations of interest.
Results: Skin self-examination conducted 1-11 times during a recent year was associated with a possible decrease in melanoma risk (OR 0·74; 95% CI 0·54-1·02). Melanoma risk was decreased for those who conducted skin self-examination and saw a doctor (OR 0·52; 95% CI 0·30-0·90). Among cases, those who examined their skin were twice as likely to self-detect the melanoma (OR 2·23; 95% CI 1·47-3·38), but self-detection was not associated with shallower tumours. Tumour depth was reduced for those who conducted skin self-examination 1-11 times during a recent year (OR 0·39; 95% CI 0·18-0·81), but was not influenced by seeing a doctor, or by conducting skin self-examination and seeing a doctor.
Conclusions: Risk of a deeper tumour and possibly risk of melanoma were reduced by skin self-examination 1-11 times annually. Melanoma risk was markedly reduced by skin self-examination coupled with a doctor visit. We cannot, however, exclude the possibility that our findings reflect bias or confounding. Additional studies are needed to elucidate the potential benefits of skin self-examination for melanoma prevention and early detection.
© 2012 The Authors. BJD © 2012 British Association of Dermatologists.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Comment in
-
Skin self-examination and the ABCDE rule in the early diagnosis of melanoma: is the game over?Br J Dermatol. 2013 Jun;168(6):1370-1. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12250. Br J Dermatol. 2013. PMID: 23738643 No abstract available.
-
Skin self-examination and the ABCDE rule in the early diagnosis of melanoma: is the game over? Reply from author.Br J Dermatol. 2013 Jun;168(6):1371-2. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12251. Br J Dermatol. 2013. PMID: 23738644 No abstract available.
References
-
- Friedman RJ, Rigel DS, Silverman MK, Kopf AW, Vossaert KA. Malignant melanomas in the 1990’s: the continued importance of early detection and the role of physician examination and self-examination of the skin. CA Cancer J Clin. 1991;41:201–226. - PubMed
-
- Koh HK, Geller AC. Public health interventions for melanoma. Hem Onc Cl N Am. 1998;12:904–929. - PubMed
-
- Oliveria SA, Chau D, Christos PJ, Charles CA, Mushlin AI, Halpern AC. Diagnostic accuracy of patients in performing skin self-examination and the impact of photography. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:57–62. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical