Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;103(3):462-72.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300723. Epub 2012 Aug 16.

Intimate partner violence and socioeconomic deprivation in England: findings from a national cross-sectional survey

Affiliations

Intimate partner violence and socioeconomic deprivation in England: findings from a national cross-sectional survey

Hind Khalifeh et al. Am J Public Health. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: We examined the prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) and its association with social deprivation in England.

Methods: We used multivariable logistic regression to investigate IPV correlates among 21 226 men and women aged 16 to 59 years in the 2008 nationally representative cross-sectional British Crime Survey.

Results: Lifetime IPV was reported by 23.8% of women and 11.5% of men. Physical IPV was reported by 16.8% and 7.0%, respectively; emotional-only IPV was reported by 5.8% and 4.2%, respectively. After adjustment for demographic confounders, lifetime physical IPV experienced by women was associated with social housing tenure (odds ratio [OR] = 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.0, 2.7), low household income (OR = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.8, 2.7), poor educational attainment (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.0, 1.5), low social class (OR = 1.5; 95% CI = 0.3, 1.7), and living in a multiply deprived area (OR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.1, 1.7). Physical IPV experienced by men and emotional IPV experienced by either gender were generally not associated with deprivation factors.

Conclusions: Physical and emotional IPV are very common among adults in England. Emotional IPV prevention policies may be appropriate across the social spectrum; those for physical IPV should be particularly accessible to disadvantaged women.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Preventing Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Against Women. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010
    1. Heise L, Garcia-Moreno C. Violence against intimate partners. : Krug E, Dahlberg L, Mercy J, World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002
    1. Feder G, Ramsay J, Dunne Det al. How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(16):iii–iv, xi–xiii, 1–113, 137–347 - PubMed
    1. Wu V, Huff H, Bhandari M. Pattern of physical injury associated with intimate partner violence in women presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2010;11(2):71–82 - PubMed
    1. Ellsberg M, Jansen H, Heise L, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C, WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence Against Women Study Team Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: an observational study. Lancet. 2008;371(9619):1165–1172 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources