The cryoprotectant used, its concentration, and the equilibration time are critical for the successful cryopreservation of rabbit sperm: DIMETHylacetamide versus dimethylsulfoxide
- PMID: 22898020
- DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.06.009
The cryoprotectant used, its concentration, and the equilibration time are critical for the successful cryopreservation of rabbit sperm: DIMETHylacetamide versus dimethylsulfoxide
Abstract
This study was designed to identify a suitable freezing protocol for rabbit semen by comparing the effects of different concentrations and equilibration times of dimethylacetamide (DMA) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) on the postthaw quality of the semen. After establishing the best protocols for each cryoprotectant, their efficacy was compared by examining the in vivo fertilizing capacity of the semen samples. Pooled semen samples diluted in freezing medium containing 4%, 6%, or 8% DMA or DMSO (all combined with 1% sucrose as a nonpermeating cryoprotectant) were loaded in straws and equilibrated for 5, 15, or 45 min before freezing in liquid nitrogen vapor. The variables assessed after thawing were sperm motility, viability, osmotic resistance, and acrosome and DNA integrity. Marked effects on these variables were shown by the cryoprotectant concentration and equilibration time, with best results obtained using DMA 6% or DMSO 8% and equilibration times of 45 min. These freezing protocols were selected to compare the two cryoprotectants in an insemination trial. Three groups of 114 rabbit does (28 nulliparous and 86 multiparous in each group) were inseminated with fresh semen or with semen frozen using the optimized DMA or DMSO protocols. Fertility rates and numbers of kids born were similar, respectively for the DMSO-frozen (79.8% and 7.7 ± 0.3 young per kindling) and fresh semen (81.6% and 8.6 ± 0.3) yet higher (P ≤ 0.05) than the rates returned using the DMA-frozen semen (47.4% and 6.7 ± 0.4). Moreover, the numbers of rabbits born alive when DMSO was used in the freezing protocol, despite being lower than those recorded using fresh semen, were higher than when DMA was used as the cryoprotectant (P < 0.05). The physiological status of the does (nulliparous or multiparous) had no influence on the fertility and prolificacy results. Our findings indicate that the cryosurvival of rabbit sperm frozen using DMSO or DMA as the cryoprotectant is highly influenced by the concentration of cryoprotectant used and the time the semen is exposed to the agent before freezing. According to our in vivo fertility and prolificacy data, DMSO emerged as more effective than DMA for the cryopreservation of rabbit sperm.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Cryopreservation of rabbit semen: comparing the effects of different cryoprotectants, cryoprotectant-free vitrification, and the use of albumin plus osmoprotectants on sperm survival and fertility after standard vapor freezing and vitrification.Theriogenology. 2013 Feb;79(3):508-16. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.11.008. Epub 2012 Dec 4. Theriogenology. 2013. PMID: 23218394
-
The successful double cryopreservation of rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) semen in large volume using the directional freezing technique with reduced concentration of cryoprotectant.Theriogenology. 2006 Mar 1;65(4):788-98. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.06.010. Epub 2005 Aug 19. Theriogenology. 2006. PMID: 16112183
-
Cryopreserving turkey semen in straws and nitrogen vapour using DMSO or DMA: effects of cryoprotectant concentration, freezing rate and thawing rate on post-thaw semen quality.Br Poult Sci. 2016 Apr;57(2):264-70. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2016.1148261. Br Poult Sci. 2016. PMID: 26872498
-
Comparative cryopreservation of avian spermatozoa: effects of freezing and thawing rates on turkey and sandhill crane sperm cryosurvival.Anim Reprod Sci. 2012 Mar;131(1-2):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 9. Anim Reprod Sci. 2012. PMID: 22406423 Review.
-
Cryopreservation of domestic animal sperm cells.Cell Tissue Bank. 2009 Feb;10(1):49-62. doi: 10.1007/s10561-008-9081-4. Epub 2008 Jun 12. Cell Tissue Bank. 2009. PMID: 18548333 Review.
Cited by
-
Cryopreserving Rabbit Semen: Impact of Varying Sperm Concentrations on Quality and the Standardization of Protocol.Vet Sci. 2023 Dec 22;11(1):9. doi: 10.3390/vetsci11010009. Vet Sci. 2023. PMID: 38250915 Free PMC article.
-
Optimization of Sperm Cryopreservation Protocol for Mediterranean Brown Trout: A Comparative Study of Non-Permeating Cryoprotectants and Thawing Rates In Vitro and In Vivo.Animals (Basel). 2019 May 31;9(6):304. doi: 10.3390/ani9060304. Animals (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31159204 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of glycerol, n, n-dimethylformamide and n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone on rabbit sperm stored at 4 °C and 16 °C.Anim Reprod. 2019 Nov 14;16(4):887-894. doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0100. Anim Reprod. 2019. PMID: 32368268 Free PMC article.
-
Sperm Cryopreservation in Canaries to Protect Endangered Songbird Species: Comparison of Different Cryoprotectants.Vet Med Sci. 2024 Nov;10(6):e70101. doi: 10.1002/vms3.70101. Vet Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 39474780 Free PMC article.
-
Freezing Protocol Optimization for Iberian Red Deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) Epididymal Sperm under Field Conditions.Animals (Basel). 2022 Mar 30;12(7):869. doi: 10.3390/ani12070869. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35405858 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources