Overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of reminders in improving healthcare professional behavior
- PMID: 22898173
- PMCID: PMC3503870
- DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-36
Overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of reminders in improving healthcare professional behavior
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this project was to conduct an overview of existing systematic reviews to evaluate the effectiveness of reminders in changing professional behavior in clinical settings.
Materials and methods: Relevant systematic reviews of reminder interventions were identified through searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, DARE and the Cochrane Library in conjunction with a larger project examining professional behavioral change interventions. Reviews were appraised using AMSTAR, a validated tool for assessing the quality of systematic reviews. As most reviews only reported vote counting, conclusions about effectiveness for each review were based on a count of positive studies. If available, we also report effect sizes. Conclusions were based on the findings from higher quality and current systematic reviews.
Results: Thirty-five reviews were eligible for inclusion in this overview. Ten reviews examined the effectiveness of reminders generally, 5 reviews focused on specific health care settings, 14 reviews concentrated on specific behaviors and 6 reviews addressed specific patient populations. The quality of the reviews was variable (median = 3, range = 1 to 8). Seven reviews had AMSTAR scores >5 and were considered in detail. Five of these seven reviews demonstrated positive effects of reminders in changing provider behavior. Few reviews used quantitative pooling methods; in one high quality and current review, the overall observed effects were moderate with an absolute median improvement in performance of 4.2% (IQR: 0.5% to 6.6%).
Discussion: The results support that modest improvements can occur with the use of reminders. The effect size is consistent with other interventions that have been used to improve professional behavior.
Conclusion: Reminders appear effective in improving different clinical behaviors across a range of settings.
Figures
References
-
- MacDonald CJ. Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectibility of man. N Engl J Med. 1976;24:1351–1355. - PubMed
-
- Haynes RB, Walker CJ. Computer-aided quality assurance. A critical appraisal. Arch Intern Med. 1987;7:1297–1301. - PubMed
-
- Becker LA Oxman AD. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 501 . Higgins JPT, Green S, editor. 2008. Chapter 22: Overviews of reviews. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
-
- Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD. Getting research findings into practice. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ. 1998;317(7156):465–468. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7156.465. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
