Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul-Aug;16(4):268-74.

Reliability of transverse plane pelvic alignment measurement during the bridge test with unilateral knee extension

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 22899181

Reliability of transverse plane pelvic alignment measurement during the bridge test with unilateral knee extension

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Juliana A Andrade et al. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2012 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: The bridge test with unilateral knee extension evaluates the stability of the trunk and pelvis. The evaluation of this stability can contribute to the understanding of the occurrence of musculoskeletal injuries.

Objectives: To investigate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a qualitative analysis and intra-test reliability of a quantitative analysis of transverse plane pelvic alignment during the bridge test with unilateral knee extension.

Method: Thirty participants (24.73±4.24 years old) were tested. The qualitative analysis was conducted by asking two raters to judge the transverse plane pelvic alignment and its reliability was assessed with the weighted kappa coefficient (k(w)). The quantitative analysis was conducted by measuring the greatest pelvic tilt angle in transverse plane and its reliability was assessed by use of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); the mean change, which was evaluated using 95% confidence interval of the mean difference (95%CI d) and Bland-Altman plot; and the quantification of measurement variability, which was assessed using standard error of measurement (SEM) and the coefficient of variation of the typical error (CVTE). In addition, the minimal detectable change (MDC₉₅) was determined.

Results: The intra-rater reliability ranged from fair to moderate (k(w)=0.32 to 0.58) and the inter-rater reliability was substantial (k(w)=0.80). The intra-test reliability was excellent (ICC=0.82), the 95%CI d ranged from -0.51º to 1.99º, the SEM was 2.38° and the CV(TE) was 28.75%. The MDC₉₅ was 6.59°.

Conclusions: The inter-rater reliability was greater than the intra-rater reliability; the intra-test reliability was excellent and showed no systematic or random error.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources