Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:921942.
doi: 10.1155/2012/921942. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

Evaluating the Correlation between Overjet and Skeletal Parameters Using DVT

Affiliations

Evaluating the Correlation between Overjet and Skeletal Parameters Using DVT

Luca Lombardo et al. Int J Dent. 2012.

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate the degree of correlation between a dental parameter of immediate clinical relevance (overjet) with skeletal (ANB angle) and dentoskeletal parameters such as the IMPA angle and upper incisor-bispinal angle. Materials and Methods. A sample of 42 subjects, all in complete permanent dentition and without a history of orthodontic treatment or systemic pathologies, was subdivided into 2 groups: group 1 consisted of 25 subjects with ANB angle 0°-4° (skeletal class I), and group 2 was made up of 17 subjects with ANB angle >4° (skeletal class II). Each subject underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). For each right and left CBCT, the following parameters were measured: (1) ANB, (2) OJ (overjet), (3) IMPA angle, and (4) upper incisor-bispinal angle (U1/ANS-PNS). Results. Analysis of the entire sample revealed that both right and left overjets were correlated in a statistically significant fashion (P < 0.001) with ANB. No correlation between overjet and IMPA emerged, while a weak correlation between overjet and the left U1-bispinal plane was ascertained. Conclusions. Overjet may be a reliable predictor of ANB, and to a lesser extent the U1-bispinal plane, particularly in skeletal class II.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of CBCT right and left of two subjects. The first two figures belong to a subject with ANB 0°–4° (skeletal class I), the second two to a subject with ANB >4° (skeletal class II). In the images, axes and angles like ANB, IMPA, U1-bispinal plane, and overjet were drawn to explain the aim of this work. In the research, each parameter was analysed via NNT NewTom 3G software using particularly secondary reconstruction.

References

    1. Proffit WR, Ackerman JL. Orthodontic diagnosis: the development of a problem list. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, editors. Contemporary Orthodontics . 3rd edition. St. Louis, Mo, USA: Mosby; 2000. pp. 145–1293.
    1. Harrison JE, O’Brien KD, Worthington HV. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews . 2007;18(3)CD003452 - PubMed
    1. Proffit WR, et al. Contemporary Orthodontics . 2nd edition. chapter 1. St. Louis, Mo, USA: Mosby; 1993.
    1. Hussels W, Nanda RS. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB. American Journal of Orthodontics . 1984;85(5):411–423. - PubMed
    1. Steiner CC. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Report of a case. American Journal of Orthodontics . 1960;46(10):721–735.

LinkOut - more resources