Perspectives on the role of nanotechnology in bone tissue engineering
- PMID: 22901861
- PMCID: PMC3638810
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.001
Perspectives on the role of nanotechnology in bone tissue engineering
Abstract
Objective: This review surveys new developments in bone tissue engineering, specifically focusing on the promising role of nanotechnology and describes future avenues of research.
Methods: The review first reinforces the need to fabricate scaffolds with multi-dimensional hierarchies for improved mechanical integrity. Next, new advances to promote bioactivity by manipulating the nanolevel internal surfaces of scaffolds are examined followed by an evaluation of techniques using scaffolds as a vehicle for local drug delivery to promote bone regeneration/integration and methods of seeding cells into the scaffold.
Results: Through a review of the state of the field, critical questions are posed to guide future research toward producing materials and therapies to bring state-of-the-art technology to clinical settings.
Significance: The development of scaffolds for bone regeneration requires a material able to promote rapid bone formation while possessing sufficient strength to prevent fracture under physiological loads. Success in simultaneously achieving mechanical integrity and sufficient bioactivity with a single material has been limited. However, the use of new tools to manipulate and characterize matter down to the nano-scale may enable a new generation of bone scaffolds that will surpass the performance of autologous bone implants.
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Figures
References
-
- Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: An update. Injury. 2005;36:20–27. - PubMed
-
- Friedlaender GE, Mankin HJ, Goldberg VM. Bone Grafts and Bone Graft Substitutes. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2006.
-
- Bajaj AK, Wongworawat AA, Punjabi A. Management of alveolar clefts. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14:840–6. - PubMed
-
- Clavero J, Lundgren S. Ramus or chin grafts for maxillary sinus inlay and local onlay augmentation: Comparison of donor site morbidity and complications. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5:154–60. - PubMed
-
- Brighton CT, Shaman P, Heppenstall RB, Esterhai JL, Pollack SR, Friedenberg ZB. Tibial nonunion treated with direct-current, capacitive coupling, or bone-graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995:223–234. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
