Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul;6(3):235-43.

Assessment of a dental rural teaching program

Affiliations

Assessment of a dental rural teaching program

George Johnson et al. Eur J Dent. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a rural clinical placement on students' self-perceived clinical skills and work location choice post-graduation.

Methods: A one month rural placement program was introduced in 2008-2009 for 4(th) year dental undergraduates. Student's views on the rural exercise were collected by pre and post self-completion questionnaires, which were distributed to rural placement students and to the students who did not participate in the placement. Information was collected on self-reported skill levels in various clinical techniques using Likert scales and future rural work intentions. Clinical supervisors and University Faculty Members opinions on the students clinical work were also collected via interviews.

Results: The mean age of the respondents was 27 years and the majority were female (57%). All the placement students (volunteers) completed pre and post placement questionnaires and (67%) of the non-placement students completed the pre questionnaire and (65%) a post questionnaire. When the two groups were compared in terms of their Likert scores, there was a significantly (P<.02) larger increase in skill level in the rural group. Clinical supervisors confirmed volunteers increased in confidence and ability in clinical skills post placement. The majority (96%) of students who completed a placement reported that they were more likely to work in a rural environment after graduation.

Conclusions: The rural placement improved the self-perceived clinical skills of the volunteers and enhanced positive attitudes towards working in a rural location.

Keywords: Clinical; dental placement; rural; undergraduates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Teusner DN, Chrisopoulos S, Brennan DS. Dental Statistics and research Canbera: AIHW; 2003. Geographic distribution of the Australian dental labour force; p. 37. Cat.no. DEN 168.
    1. Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health . Working papers of the ARCPOH/Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Dental Statistics and Research Unit workshop on the dental labour force. Adelaide, SA: ARCPOH/AIHW; 2002.
    1. Sengupta TK, Murray RB, McDonell A, Murphy B, Underhill AD. Rural internships for final year students: clinical experience, education and workforce. Rural Rem Health. 2008;8:827. http://www.rrh.org.au. - PubMed
    1. Wilson M, Cleland J. Evidence for the acceptability and academic success of an innovative remote and rural extended placement. Rural Rem Health. 2008;8:960. http://www.rrh.org.au. - PubMed
    1. Wilkinson D, Laven G, Pratt N, Beilby J. Impact of undergraduate and postgraduate rural training, and medical school entry criteria on rural practice among Australian general practitioners: national study of 2414 doctors. Med Edu J. 2003;37:809–814. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources