Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul;6(3):311-7.

The effects of bluephase LED light on fibroblasts

Affiliations

The effects of bluephase LED light on fibroblasts

Ana Ivanišević Malčić et al. Eur J Dent. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Bluephase light emitting diode (LED) light on cell viability, colony-forming ability and proliferation in V79 cell culture and to determine how much the temperature of the nutrient medium rose.

Methods: The investigation included a low (L), soft start (S) and high (H) illumination mode for 20, 40 and 80 seconds. The viability was determined by the trypan blue exclusion test, colony-forming ability by counting colonies 7 days after exposure and cell proliferation by the cell counts on 5 post-exposure days. The temperature change during illumination was recorded (0.1°C sensitivity).

Results: In each experimental condition, 90-95% of the cells were viable, which was in the same range as the controls. Colony-forming ability was not found to be significantly lower (P<.05). A significant decrease in proliferation was recorded on the 4th post-exposure day with S and H irrespective of time, on the 3(rd) day with S for 80 s and H for 40 and 80 s, and with S and H for 80 s on the 2(nd) day (P<.05).The temperature rise was significant with S (P<.05) and H (P<.05), irrespective of exposure duration.

Conclusion: Dependent on total energy density, LED blue light affects the mitotic activity of cells in its path to a certain extent. Altered mitotic activity was not noted with illumination at the low power mode (intensity of 421.7 ±1.1 mW/cm(2)). The greatest temperature rise was 8.3 °C and occurred at the highest intensity and exposure duration.

Keywords: Bluephase effects; LED light; fibroblasts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental model

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Schmit JL. Polymerization of composite resins: argon laser vs. conventional light. Oper Dent. 1998;23:87–93. - PubMed
    1. Tarle Z, Knežević A, Demoli N, Meniga A, Šutalo J, Unterbrink G, Ristić M, Pichler G. Comparison of Composite curing parameters: effects of light source and curing mode on conversion, temperature rise and polimerization shrinkage. Oper Dent. 2006;31(2):219–226. - PubMed
    1. Jandt KD, Mills RW, Blackwell GB, Ashworth S. Depth of cure and compressive strength of dental composites cured with blue light emitting diodes (LEDs) Dent Mater. 2000;16:41–47. - PubMed
    1. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, García-Godoy F, Frankenberger R. Light curing of resin-based composites in the LED era. Am J Dent. 2008;21:135–142. - PubMed
    1. Bruzell Roll EM, Jacobsen N, Hensten-Pettersen A. Health hazards associated with curing light in the dental clinic. Clin Oral Invest. 2004;8:113–117. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources