Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 20:12:24.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-12-24.

Estimation of menstrual blood loss volume based on menstrual diary and laboratory data

Affiliations

Estimation of menstrual blood loss volume based on menstrual diary and laboratory data

Ulrike Schumacher et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: Abnormal uterine bleeding is often investigated in clinical studies and critical to identify during gynecological consultation. The current standard for quantification of menstrual blood loss is the alkaline-hematin-method. However, this method is expensive and inconvenient for patients. Bleeding diaries, although widely used, provide only qualitative information on menstrual blood loss. Other methods have been developed, but still do not provide reliable quantitative data.

Methods: We estimated blood loss volume using data from two clinical studies in women suffering abnormal menstrual bleeding. These estimations were derived from mixed linear models based on diary data, hematological parameters and age. To validate the models, we applied our results to data from a third study with a similar patient population.

Results: The resulting best fitting model uses diary entries on bleeding intensity at a particular day, information on occurrence and frequency of single bleeding intensities in defined time windows, hemoglobin and ferritin values and age of the patient all as predictors of menstrual blood loss volume. Sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of excessive bleeding were 87% and 70%, respectively. Our model-based estimates reflect the subjective assessment by physicians and patients in the same way as the measured values do.When applying the model to an independent study, we found a correlation of 0.73 between estimated and measured values for the blood loss in a single day. Further models with reduced number of parameters (simplified for easier practical use) still showed correlation values between 0.69 and 0.73.

Conclusions: We present a method for estimating menstrual blood loss volume in women suffering from prolonged or excessive menstrual bleeding. Our statistical model includes entries from bleeding diaries, laboratory parameters and age and produces results which correlate well with data derived by the alkaline-hematin-method. Therefore, this model may be used to estimate menstrual blood loss volume in both routine gynecological counseling and clinical studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Validation study, mean and difference of measured and estimated MBLV values.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bachmann G, Korner P. Bleeding patterns associated with oral contraceptive use: a review of the literature. Contraception. 2007;76(3):182–189. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.05.081. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bachmann G, Korner P. Bleeding patterns associated with non-oral hormonal contraceptives: a review of the literature. Contraception. 2009;79(4):247–258. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.10.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Matteson KA, Boardman LA, Munro MG, Clark MA. Abnormal uterine bleeding: a review of patient-based outcome measures. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(1):205–216. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu Z, Doan QV, Blumenthal P, Dubois R. A systematic review evaluating health-related quality of life, work impairment, and health-care costs and utilization in abnormal uterine bleeding. Value Health. 2007;10(3):183–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00168.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hallberg L, Hogdahl A-M, Nilsson L, Rybo G. Menstrual blood loss - a population study - variation at different ages and attempts to define normality. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1966;45(3):320–351. doi: 10.3109/00016346609158455. - DOI - PubMed