Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Oct;24(5):299-304.
doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283577e9d.

Expedited partner therapy for sexually transmitted infections

Affiliations
Review

Expedited partner therapy for sexually transmitted infections

Matthew Hogben et al. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose of review: In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) as a clinical option for assuring treatment of sex partners of persons infected with sexually transmitted infections. In this review, we provide an update on research, evaluation and efforts to increase EPT coverage. We also attend to EPT for gonorrhea in the context of antimicrobial resistance.

Recent findings: Controlled trials in the United States and United Kingdom have presented increasing variety in intervention approaches. Trials and program evaluations typically demonstrate increased partner treatment rates, although only some studies show reductions in follow-up infection rates. Coverage has increased substantially, with over 30 states permitting EPT for chlamydial infection, gonorrhea, or both. The prospect of cephalosporin-resistant gonorrhea, however, raises the prospect that EPT may become less feasible as a partner treatment approach for gonorrhea patients.

Summary: Clinicians should continue to be aware of the importance of partner managements for STD-infected patients, with EPT being an evidence-based intervention in that respect. The variety in EPT models provides alternatives that may suit some practices and venues. For clinicians seeing gonorrhea patients, effective counseling models - enhanced patient referral - should be closely examined in case oral treatment for gonorrhea becomes infeasible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

M.H., S.K. and G.R.B. declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Expedited partner therapy in the management of sexually transmitted diseases: Review and guidance. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services, 2006.
    1. Steiner KC, Davila V, Kent CK, et al. Field-delivered therapy increases treatment for chlamydia and gonorrhea. Am J Public Health 2003; 93:882–884. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kissinger P, Hogben M. Expedited partner therapy for sexually transmitted infections: an update. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2011; 13:188–195. - PubMed
    1. Schillinger JA, Kissinger P, Calvet H, et al. Patient-delivered partner treatment with azithromycin to prevent repeated Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30:49–56. - PubMed
    1. Golden MR, Whittington WW, Handsfield HH, et al. Impact of expedited sex partner treatment on recurrent or persistent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection: a randomized controlled trial. New Engl J Med 2005; 352:676–685. - PubMed

Substances