A randomized, evaluator-blind, phase 2 study comparing the safety and efficacy of omadacycline to those of linezolid for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections
- PMID: 22908151
- PMCID: PMC3486554
- DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00948-12
A randomized, evaluator-blind, phase 2 study comparing the safety and efficacy of omadacycline to those of linezolid for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections
Abstract
A randomized, investigator-blind, multicenter phase 2 trial involving patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) compared the safety and efficacy of omadacycline, a broad-spectrum agent with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), to those of linezolid (with or without aztreonam). Patients were randomized 1:1 to omadacycline (100 mg intravenously [i.v.] once a day [QD] with an option to transition to 200 mg orally QD) or linezolid (600 mg i.v. twice daily [BID] with an option to transition to 600 mg orally BID) at 11 U.S. sites. Patients suspected or documented to have infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria were given aztreonam (2 g i.v. every 12 h [q12h]) if randomized to linezolid or matching placebo infusions if randomized to omadacycline. Adverse events were reported in 46 (41.4%) omadacycline-treated and 55 (50.9%) linezolid-treated patients. Adverse events related to treatment were assessed by investigators in 24 (21.6%) omadacycline-treated and 33 (30.6%) linezolid-treated patients. The gastrointestinal tract was most commonly involved, with adverse events reported in 21 (18.9%) patients exposed to omadacycline and 20 (18.5%) exposed to linezolid. Rates of successful clinical response in the intent-to-treat (ITT) and clinical evaluable (CE) populations favored omadacycline (ITT, 88.3% versus 75.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 to 22.9; CE, 98.0% versus 93.2%; 95% CI, -1.7 to 11.3). For microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients with S. aureus infections, the clinical success rates were 97.2% (70/72) in omadacycline-treated and 92.7% (51/55) in linezolid-treated patients. This phase 2 experience supports conclusions that omadacycline is well tolerated in cSSSI patients and that this aminomethylcycline has potential to be an effective treatment for serious skin infections.
Similar articles
-
Omadacycline for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin-Structure Infections.N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 7;380(6):528-538. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800170. N Engl J Med. 2019. PMID: 30726689 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized, double-blind comparison of once-weekly dalbavancin versus twice-daily linezolid therapy for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Nov 15;41(10):1407-15. doi: 10.1086/497271. Epub 2005 Oct 6. Clin Infect Dis. 2005. PMID: 16231250 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical efficacy of oral linezolid compared with intravenous vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-complicated skin and soft tissue infections: a retrospective, propensity score-matched, case-control analysis.Clin Ther. 2012 Aug;34(8):1667-73.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.018. Epub 2012 Jul 6. Clin Ther. 2012. PMID: 22770644
-
Omadacycline: A Novel Oral and Intravenous Aminomethylcycline Antibiotic Agent.Drugs. 2020 Feb;80(3):285-313. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01257-4. Drugs. 2020. PMID: 31970713 Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of linezolid in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002 Jul;21(7):491-8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-002-0753-x. Epub 2002 Jul 10. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002. PMID: 12172739 Review.
Cited by
-
Antimicrobial Activity of Omadacycline Tested against Clinical Bacterial Isolates from Hospitals in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan: Results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2013 to 2016).Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Feb 26;63(3):e02262-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02262-18. Print 2019 Mar. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019. PMID: 30617092 Free PMC article.
-
Tetracycline Antibiotics and Resistance.Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016 Apr 1;6(4):a025387. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a025387. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016. PMID: 26989065 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Omadacycline for treatment of acute bacterial infections: a meta-analysis of phase II/III trials.BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 14;23(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08212-0. BMC Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 37059988 Free PMC article.
-
Structural characterization of an alternative mode of tigecycline binding to the bacterial ribosome.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 May;59(5):2849-54. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04895-14. Epub 2015 Mar 9. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015. PMID: 25753625 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacokinetics, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion of Omadacycline following a Single Intravenous or Oral Dose of 14C-Omadacycline in Rats.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Dec 27;61(1):e01784-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01784-16. Print 2017 Jan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016. PMID: 27821446 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bhatia B, et al. 2004. Activity of BAY 73-7388, a novel aminomethylcyclines and other novel anyibiotic classes against resistant bacteria in vitro, abstr P925. Abstr. 14th Eur. Congress Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis
-
- Biedenbach DJ, Mendes RE, Sader HS, Jones RN. 2010. In vitro evaluation of PTK 0796 activity tested against S. aureus, including hospital and community associated MRSA strains from U.S. and Europe, abstr E1569. Abstr. 50th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother
-
- FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) 2010. Guidance for industry. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: developing drugs for treatment. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformati...
-
- King MD, et al. 2006. Emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA 300 clone as the predominant cause of skin and soft-tissue infections. Ann. Intern. Med. 144:309–317 - PubMed
-
- Macone A, Donatelli J, Dumont T, Levy SB, Tanaka K. 2003. In vitro activity of PTK 0796 against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, abstr 2439. Abstr. 43rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical