Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2012 Nov;56(11):5650-4.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00948-12. Epub 2012 Aug 20.

A randomized, evaluator-blind, phase 2 study comparing the safety and efficacy of omadacycline to those of linezolid for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomized, evaluator-blind, phase 2 study comparing the safety and efficacy of omadacycline to those of linezolid for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections

Gary J Noel et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

A randomized, investigator-blind, multicenter phase 2 trial involving patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) compared the safety and efficacy of omadacycline, a broad-spectrum agent with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), to those of linezolid (with or without aztreonam). Patients were randomized 1:1 to omadacycline (100 mg intravenously [i.v.] once a day [QD] with an option to transition to 200 mg orally QD) or linezolid (600 mg i.v. twice daily [BID] with an option to transition to 600 mg orally BID) at 11 U.S. sites. Patients suspected or documented to have infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria were given aztreonam (2 g i.v. every 12 h [q12h]) if randomized to linezolid or matching placebo infusions if randomized to omadacycline. Adverse events were reported in 46 (41.4%) omadacycline-treated and 55 (50.9%) linezolid-treated patients. Adverse events related to treatment were assessed by investigators in 24 (21.6%) omadacycline-treated and 33 (30.6%) linezolid-treated patients. The gastrointestinal tract was most commonly involved, with adverse events reported in 21 (18.9%) patients exposed to omadacycline and 20 (18.5%) exposed to linezolid. Rates of successful clinical response in the intent-to-treat (ITT) and clinical evaluable (CE) populations favored omadacycline (ITT, 88.3% versus 75.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 to 22.9; CE, 98.0% versus 93.2%; 95% CI, -1.7 to 11.3). For microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients with S. aureus infections, the clinical success rates were 97.2% (70/72) in omadacycline-treated and 92.7% (51/55) in linezolid-treated patients. This phase 2 experience supports conclusions that omadacycline is well tolerated in cSSSI patients and that this aminomethylcycline has potential to be an effective treatment for serious skin infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bhatia B, et al. 2004. Activity of BAY 73-7388, a novel aminomethylcyclines and other novel anyibiotic classes against resistant bacteria in vitro, abstr P925. Abstr. 14th Eur. Congress Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis
    1. Biedenbach DJ, Mendes RE, Sader HS, Jones RN. 2010. In vitro evaluation of PTK 0796 activity tested against S. aureus, including hospital and community associated MRSA strains from U.S. and Europe, abstr E1569. Abstr. 50th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother
    1. FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) 2010. Guidance for industry. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: developing drugs for treatment. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformati...
    1. King MD, et al. 2006. Emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA 300 clone as the predominant cause of skin and soft-tissue infections. Ann. Intern. Med. 144:309–317 - PubMed
    1. Macone A, Donatelli J, Dumont T, Levy SB, Tanaka K. 2003. In vitro activity of PTK 0796 against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, abstr 2439. Abstr. 43rd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother

Publication types

MeSH terms