Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 21:12:113.
doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-113.

Cholecystomucoclasis: revaluation of safety and validity in aged populations

Tomoya Tsukada  1 , Tatsuo Nakano, Takashi Miyata, Shozo Sasaki, Tetsuo Ohta
Affiliations

Cholecystomucoclasis: revaluation of safety and validity in aged populations

Tomoya Tsukada et al. BMC Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the safety and validity of cholecystomucoclasis (CM) and compared its intraoperative characteristics with those of standard cholecystectomy (SC).

Methods: We enrolled 174 patients who underwent cholecystectomy and retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of patients in the SC and CM groups.

Results: Significant differences in age (71.1 vs. 61.9 years), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS), and serum C-reactive protein levels (CRP) (18.1 vs. 4.7 mg/dL) were observed between the CM and SC groups. Conversely, no significant differences were observed in the operation time (129 vs. 108 min), amount of blood loss (147 vs. 80 mL), intraoperative complications (0% vs. 5.7%), or duration of hospital stay (13.2 vs. 8.9 days) between the 2 groups. A high conversion rate (35.3%), postoperative complications (33%), and frequent drain insertions (94%) were observed in the CM group.

Conclusions: CM is a safe and valid surgical procedure and surgeons should not hesitate to transition to CM for patients who are of advanced age, in poor general condition (high ASA classification), or have high levels of serum CRP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative intraoperative findings of cholecystomucoclasis for acute cholecystitis. a: Overview of acute cholecystitis. b: Double-clipped cystic artery (arrowhead). c: The gallbladder was incised carefully because of the lack of a clear indication of the correct layer. d: The gallbladder mucosa cauterized by electrocautery (arrowhead).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative intraoperative findings of cholecystomucoclasis for atrophic cholecystitis. a: Overview of atrophic gallbladder in chronic cholecystitis. b: Injury of the gallbladder body wall while dissecting from the liver bed. The gallbladder mucosa and gallstones were exposed (arrowhead). c: The gallbladder was incised consecutively from the site of the exposed gallbladder mucosa. d: Overview after gallbladder removal showing the residual gallbladder posterior wall (arrowhead).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Detailed analysis of the severe intraoperative complications resulting from cholecystectomy.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Scott TR, Zucker KA, Bailey RW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 12,397 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1992;2:191–198. - PubMed
    1. Perissat J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the European experience. Am J Surg. 1993;165:444–449. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80938-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2006;93:40–45. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5241. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sinha R, Sharma N. Acute cholecystitis and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2002. pp. 65–68. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kitano S, Matsumoto T, Aramaki M, Kawano K. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;9:534–547. doi: 10.1007/s005340200069. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances