Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Oct;60(1):40-53.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2012.00446.x.

Recording and surveillance systems for periodontal diseases

Review

Recording and surveillance systems for periodontal diseases

Eugenio D Beltrán-Aguilar et al. Periodontol 2000. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

This paper describes tools used to measure periodontal diseases and the integration of these tools into surveillance systems. Tools to measure periodontal diseases at the surveillance level have focussed on current manifestations of disease (e.g. gingival inflammation) or disease sequelae (e.g. periodontal pocket depth or loss of attachment). All tools reviewed in this paper were developed based on the state of the science of the pathophysiology of periodontal disease at the time of their design and the need to provide valid and reliable measurements of the presence and severity of periodontal diseases. Therefore, some of these tools are no longer valid. Others, such as loss of periodontal attachment, are the current de-facto tools but demand many resources to undertake periodical assessment of the periodontal health of populations. Less complex tools such as the Community Periodontal Index, have been used extensively to report periodontal status. Laboratory tests for detecting putative microorganisms or inflammatory agents present in periodontal diseases have been used at the clinical level, and at least one has been tested at the population level. Other approaches, such as self-report measures, are currently under validation. In this paper, we do not review indices designed to measure plaque or residual accumulation around the tooth, indices focussed only on gingival inflammation or radiographic approaches with limited applicability in surveillance systems. Finally, we review current case-definitions proposed for surveillance of periodontal disease severity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prevalence of periodontal disease (defined as at least one periodontal site with attachment loss of ≥3 mm and pocket depth of ≥4 mm) and moderate or severe periodontal disease (defined as two or more inter-proximal sites with attachment loss of ≥4 mm in different teeth OR probing depth of ≥5 mm not in the same teeth) among 20- to 64-year-old dentate adults, by age, sex, race/ ethnicity and smoking status. United States, 1999–2004 (24).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ainamo J, Barmes D, Beagrie G, Cutress T, Martin J, Sardo-Infirri J. Development of the World Health Organization (WHO) Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN) Int Dent J. 1982;32:281–291. - PubMed
    1. Baelum V, Fejerskov O, Manji F, Wanzala P. Influence of CPITN partial recordings on estimates of prevalence and severity of various periodontal conditions in adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993;21:354–359. - PubMed
    1. Barmes D. CPITN – a WHO initiative. Int Dent J. 1994;44:523–525. - PubMed
    1. Beck JD, Caplan DJ, Preisser JS, Moss K. Reducing the bias of probing depth and attachment level estimates using random partial-mouth recording. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006;34:1–10. - PubMed
    1. Beck JD, Koch GG, Rozier RG, Tudor GE. Prevalence and risk indicators for periodontal attachment loss in a population of older community-dwelling blacks and whites. J Periodontol. 1990;61:521–528. - PubMed

MeSH terms