Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct;292(1-2):26-34.
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Aug 14.

Distortion products and their influence on representation of pitch-relevant information in the human brainstem for unresolved harmonic complex tones

Affiliations

Distortion products and their influence on representation of pitch-relevant information in the human brainstem for unresolved harmonic complex tones

Christopher J Smalt et al. Hear Res. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Pitch experiments aimed at evaluating temporal pitch mechanism(s) often utilize complex sounds with only unresolved harmonic components, and a low-pass noise masker to eliminate the potential contribution of audible distortion products to the pitch percept. Herein we examine how: (i) masker induced reduction of neural distortion products (difference tone: DT; and cubic difference tone: CDT) alters the representation of pitch relevant information in the brainstem; and (ii) the pitch salience is altered when distortion products are reduced and/or eliminated. Scalp recorded brainstem frequency following responses (FFR) were recorded in normal hearing individuals using a complex tone with only unresolved harmonics presented in quiet, and in the presence of a low-pass masker at SNRs of +15, +5, and -5 dB. Difference limen for F0 discrimination (F0 DL) was obtained in quiet and in the presence of low-pass noise. Magnitude of DT components (with the exception of components at F0 and 2F0), and the CDT components decreased with increasing masker level. Neural pitch strength decreased with increasing masker level for both the envelope-related (FFR(ENV)) and spectral-related (FFR(SPEC)) phase-locked activity. Finally, F0 DLs increased with decreasing SNRs suggesting poorer F0 discrimination with reduction of the distortion products. Collectively, these findings support the notion that both DT and CDT, as reflected in the FFR(ENV) and FFR(SPEC), respectively, influence both the brainstem representation of pitch relevant information and the pitch salience of the complex sounds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Spectra of the tonal complex and low-pass noise masker to illustrate the experimental paradigm. Tonal complex contains six equal amplitude harmonics (12th–17th harmonic of a 90-Hz F0) falling in the peripherally unresolved region. Low-pass noise (500 order FIR; Fpass=885 Hz, Fstop=965 Hz, Astop=60 dB) spectra show the three levels used in the study. The spectrum of the low-pass noise shown represents an average of 1000 presentations of the noise stimuli.
Figure 2
Figure 2
FFRENV waveforms (left panels) and their spectra (right panels) from a representative participant are plotted for the quiet and three noise conditions. The multiple DT components are also identified. Note that these spectra were obtained from the electrical signals.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean magnitude of F0, 2F0 (left axis), and 3F0-8F0 DT distortion components (right axis) for the quiet and three noise conditions. The asterisk indicates statistically significant differences in magnitude across experimental conditions. Note the difference in amplitude scale for each response type. Error bars correspond to 1 SEM.
Figure 4
Figure 4
FFRSPEC waveforms (left panels) and their spectra (right panels) from a representative participant are plotted for the quiet and three noise conditions. Vertical dotted lines in the spectral plots demarcate the frequency regions containing the CDT distortion components and the FFR response to stimulus temporal fine structure (FFRSTIM). The low-pass noise region is also identified.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean magnitude of FFRSPEC response components for the stimulus temporal fine structure (FFRSTIM), and CDT distortion product components for the quiet and noise conditions. The asterisk indicates statistically significant differences in magnitude across experimental conditions. Error bars correspond to 1 SEM.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Mean autocorrelation (ACF peak amplitude) magnitude for FFRENV (circle) and FFRSPEC (square) data plotted for the quiet and noise conditions. The ACF peak magnitude, for both responses, corresponds to a delay equal to the period of the 90-Hz F0. Error bars correspond to +/− 1 SEM.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Mean F0 DL (triangle and left y-axis), mean magnitude of 3F0-8F0 DT distortion components (circle and right y-axis) and, mean magnitude of CDT distortion components (square and right y-axis) for the quiet and noise conditions. Error bars correspond to 1 SEM.

References

    1. Abel C, Kössl M. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2009;101(3):1560. - PubMed
    1. Aiken SJ, Picton TW. Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds. Hearing Research. 2008;245(1–2):35–47. - PubMed
    1. Arnold S, Burkard R. The auditory evoked potential difference tone and cubic difference tone measured from the inferior colliculus of the chinchilla. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1998;104:1565. - PubMed
    1. Bernstein JG, Oxenham AJ. Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: Harmonic resolvability or harmonic number? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2003;113(6):3323–3334. - PubMed
    1. Bhagat S, Champlin C. Evaluation of distortion products produced by the human auditory system. Hearing Research. 2004;193(1–2):51–67. - PubMed

Publication types