Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2013 Feb;24(2):454-462.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds329. Epub 2012 Aug 21.

The chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy outcome measures standardization study: from consensus to the first validity and reliability findings

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy outcome measures standardization study: from consensus to the first validity and reliability findings

G Cavaletti et al. Ann Oncol. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating and dose-limiting complication of cancer treatment. Thus far, the impact of CIPN has not been studied in a systematic clinimetric manner. The objective of the study was to select outcome measures for CIPN evaluation and to establish their validity and reproducibility in a cross-sectional multicenter study.

Patients and methods: After literature review and a consensus meeting among experts, face/content validity were obtained for the following selected scales: the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC), the Total Neuropathy Score clinical version (TNSc), the modified Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) group sensory sumscore (mISS), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, and CIPN20 quality-of-life measures. A total of 281 patients with stable CIPN were examined. Validity (correlation) and reliability studies were carried out.

Results: Good inter-/intra-observer scores were obtained for the TNSc, mISS, and NCI-CTC sensory/motor subscales. Test-retest values were also good for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and CIPN20. Acceptable validity scores were obtained through the correlation among the measures.

Conclusion: Good validity and reliability scores were demonstrated for the set of selected impairment and quality-of-life outcome measures in CIPN. Future studies are planned to investigate the responsiveness aspects of these measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study describing the time points of each examination and the outcome measures used to assess chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in our study population. NCI-CTCs+m, National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria sensory and motor subscales; TNSc, Total Neuropathy Score clinical version; mISS, modified INCAT sensory sum score; NCS, nerve conduction studies; VAS, visual analog pain scale; PI-NRS, 11-point pain-intensity numerical rating scale; preliminary RODS-CIPN, preliminary Rasch-built linearly weighted overall disability scale; QLQ-C30, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30-item questionnaire for cancer patients; QLQ-CIPN20, EORTC 20 items CIPN-specific quality-of-life questionnaire.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Results obtained by the examiners and visits using the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria sensory and motor subscales.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Results obtained by the examiners and visits using the Total Neuropathy Score clinical and the modified INCAT sensory sumscore.
Figure 4
Figure 4
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30 global health status at visits 1 and 2 (0 = worst quality of life, 100 = best quality of life).

References

    1. Cavaletti G, Frigeni B, Lanzani F, et al. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity assessment: a critical revision of the currently available tools. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:479–494. - PubMed
    1. Markman M. Chemotherapy-associated neurotoxicity: an important side effect-impacting on quality, rather than quantity, of life. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1996;122:511–512. - PubMed
    1. Wenzel L, Vergote I, Cella D. Quality of life in patients receiving treatment for gynecologic malignancies: special considerations for patient care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83(Suppl 1):211–229. - PubMed
    1. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales. A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
    1. Liang MH. Evaluating measurement responsiveness. J Rheumatol. 1995;22:1191–1192. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances