Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;22(1):118-24.
doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9519-5. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

Focusing on patient needs and preferences may improve genetic counseling for colorectal cancer

Affiliations

Focusing on patient needs and preferences may improve genetic counseling for colorectal cancer

Simone Salemink et al. J Genet Couns. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

During cancer genetic counseling, different items which counselors consider important are discussed. However, relatively little empirical evidence exists regarding the needs and preferences of counselees. In this study needs and preferences were assessed from counselees with a personal and/or family history of colorectal cancer (CRC), who were referred for genetic counseling regarding CRC. They received a slightly modified version of the QUOTE-GENE(ca) questionnaire prior to their first visit to the Hereditary Cancer Clinic. Response rate was 60 % (48/80 participants). Counselees rated the importance of 45 items assessing their needs and preferences regarding the content and process of genetic counseling. Participants rated the items regarding discussion of information about their familial CRC risk (100 %) and preventive options (98 %) as important or very important. Fewer participants rated items concerning general information on genetics as important. Sensitive communication during counseling was considered very important by a large percentage of counselees. Generally, no major differences were seen between participants in relation to individual characteristics. Our data suggest that focusing on familial CRC risk and surveillance options, in combination with sensitive communication may lead to better satisfaction with genetic counseling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albada A, Ausems M, Otten R, Bensing J, van Dulmen S. Use and evaluation of an individually tailored website for counselees prior to breast cancer genetic counseling. Journal of Cancer Education. 2011;26(4):670–681. doi: 10.1007/s13187-011-0227-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Apicella C, Peacock S, Andrews L, Tucker K, Bankier A, Daly M, et al. Determinants of preferences for genetic counselling in Jewish women. Familial Cancer. 2005;5(2):159–167. doi: 10.1007/s10689-005-3871-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bleiker E, Menko F, Taal B, Kluijt I, Wever L, Gerritsma M, et al. Screening behavior of individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer. Gasteroenterology. 2005;128(2):280–287. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Jong A, Vasen H. The frequency of a positive family history for colorectal cancer: a population-based study in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Medicine. 2006;64(10):367–370. - PubMed
    1. Dove-Edwin I, Sasieni P, Adams J, Thomas H. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: 16 year, prospective, follow-up study. British Medical Journal. 2005;331(7524):1047. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38606.794560.EB. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types