Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Aug 23:11:59.
doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-11-59.

Comparison between mechanical properties of human saphenous vein and umbilical vein

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison between mechanical properties of human saphenous vein and umbilical vein

Borhan Alhosseini Hamedani et al. Biomed Eng Online. .

Abstract

Background: As a main cause of mortality in developed countries, Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is known as silent killer with a considerable cost to be dedicated for its treatment. Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) is a common remedy for CAD for which different blood vessels are used as a detour. There is a lack of knowledge about mechanical properties of human blood vessels used for CABG, and while these properties have a great impact on long-term patency of a CABG. Thus, studying these properties, especially those of human umbilical veins which have not been considered yet, looks utterly necessary.

Methods: Umbilical vein, as well as human Saphenous vein, are respectively obtained after cesarean and CABG. First, histological tests were performed to investigate different fiber contents of the samples. Having prepared samples carefully, force-displacement results of samples were rendered to real stress-strain measurements and then a fourth-order polynomial was used to prove the non-linear behavior of these two vessels.

Results: Results were analyzed in two directions, i.e. circumferentially and longitudinally, which then were compared with each other. The comparison between stiffness and elasticity of these veins showed that Saphenous vein's stiffness is much higher than that of umbilical vein and also, it is less stretchable. Furthermore, for both vessels, longitudinal stiffness was higher than that of circumferential and in stark contrast, stretch ratio in circumferential direction came much higher than longitudinal orientation.

Conclusion: Blood pressure is very high in the region of aorta, so there should be a stiff blood vessel in this area and previous investigations showed that stiffer vessels would have a better influence on the flow of bypass. To this end, the current study has made an attempt to compare these two blood vessels' stiffness, finding that Saphenous vein is stiffer than umbilical vein which is somehow as stiff as rat aortic vessels. As blood vessel's stiffness is directly related to elastin and mainly collagen content, results showed the lower amount of these two contents in umbilical vein regarding Saphenous vein.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
a) tearing the HUV in circumferential direction, b) HUV samples in normal saline solution c: tear of SV in transversal direction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Histological section of HUV and SV. The wall may be divided into Intima (I), Media (M), and Adventitia (A) or Wharton jelly (W). a) Haemotoxylin and Eosin (HE) stained section of HUV. Layers M and W are not uniform (magnification × 100) but thicker than that of SV. b) Van Gison’s stained section of SV. Collagen fibers are blued leafs while red strings stand for smooth muscles. Adventitia is mainly composed of collagen fibers (magnification × 400).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Real stress versus stretch ratio, a) longitudinal SV, b) circumferential SV, c) longitudinal HUV, d) circumferential HUV.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Strength reduction as a result of elastin rupture before specimen’s rupture near maximum stiffness (SV, longitudinal test).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Real stress versus stretch ratio up to maximum strength for longitudinal Saphenous No.1.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Fourth order polynomial and its derivation for a) SV, b) HUV, both in longitudinal direction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Heart Association. American Stroke Association: heart disease and stroke statistics. 2010.
    1. Assoul N, Flaud P, Chaouat M, Letourneur D, Bataille I. Mechanical properties of rat thoracic and abdominal aortas. J. Biomechanics. 2008;41:2227–2236. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.04.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sh RG, Haider Z, Ahmad M, Zaman H. Saphenous vein grafts: to use or not to use? J. Heart Lung and Circulation. 2004;13:150–156. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2004.03.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Migliavacca F, Dubini G. Computational modeling of vascular anastomosis. J. Biomechan Model Mechanobiol. 2005;3:235–250. doi: 10.1007/s10237-005-0070-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alderson H, Zamir M. Smaller, stiffer coronary bypass can moderate or reverse the adverse effects of wave reflections. J. Biomechanics. 2001;34:1455–1462. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00113-0. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types