Imaging studies for non-palpable testis: Are they at all required?
- PMID: 22919150
- PMCID: PMC3424911
- DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.98477
Imaging studies for non-palpable testis: Are they at all required?
Abstract
Undescended testis is one of the common surgical disorders in childhood and twenty percent of the undescended testes are nonpalpable. Surgical management is required in almost all cases for the repositioning or removal of the undescended testes and early intervention is preferred for optimal outcome. Use of imaging studies for accurate preoperative localisation of the nonpalpable testis is a wide prevalent practice. However, available evidences have questioned the need of such studies.
Keywords: Laparoscopy; magnetic resonance imaging; non-palpable testis; ultrasonography.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Hrebinko RL, Bellinger MF. The limited role of imaging techniques in managing children with undescended testes. J Urol. 1993;150:458–60. - PubMed
-
- Elder JS. Ultrasonography is unnecessary in evaluating boys with a nonpalpable testis. Pediatrics. 2002;110:748–51. - PubMed
-
- Cisek LJ, Peters CA, Atala A, Bauer SB, Diamond DA, Retik AB. Current findings in diagnostic laparoscopic evaluation of the nonpalpable testis. J Urol. 1998;160:1145–9. - PubMed
-
- Kanemoto K, Hayashi Y, Kojima Y, Maruyama T, Ito M, Kohri K. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of nonpalpable testis. Int J Urol. 2005;12:668–72. - PubMed
-
- Wolverson MK, Houttuin E, Heiberg E, Sundaram M, Shields JB. Comparison of computed tomography with high-resolution real-time ultrasound in the localisation of the impalpable undescended testis. Radiology. 1983;146:133–6. - PubMed
