The effect of the retroperitoneal transpsoas minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion on segmental and regional lumbar lordosis
- PMID: 22919332
- PMCID: PMC3419412
- DOI: 10.1100/2012/516706
The effect of the retroperitoneal transpsoas minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion on segmental and regional lumbar lordosis
Abstract
Background: The minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion (MIS LIF) in the lumbar spine can correct coronal Cobb angles, but the effect on sagittal plane correction is unclear.
Methods: A retrospective review of thirty-five patients with lumbar degenerative disease who underwent MIS LIF without supplemental posterior instrumentation was undertaken to study the radiographic effect on the restoration of segmental and regional lumbar lordosis using the Cobb angles on pre- and postoperative radiographs. Mean disc height changes were also measured.
Results: The mean follow-up period was 13.3 months. Fifty total levels were fused with a mean of 1.42 levels fused per patient. Mean segmental Cobb angle increased from 11.10° to 13.61° (P < 0.001) or 22.6%. L2-3 had the greatest proportional increase in segmental lordosis. Mean regional Cobb angle increased from 52.47° to 53.45° (P = 0.392). Mean disc height increased from 6.50 mm to 10.04 mm (P < 0.001) or 54.5%.
Conclusions: The MIS LIF improves segmental lordosis and disc height in the lumbar spine but not regional lumbar lordosis. Anterior longitudinal ligament sectioning and/or the addition of a more lordotic implant may be necessary in cases where significant increases in regional lumbar lordosis are desired.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study.J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jul;15(1):92-6. doi: 10.3171/2011.3.SPINE10425. Epub 2011 Apr 8. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011. PMID: 21476802
-
Management of sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity with minimally invasive anterolateral lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary radiographic study.J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 May;20(5):515-22. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.SPINE1347. Epub 2014 Mar 14. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014. PMID: 24628129
-
Lordosis restoration after anterior longitudinal ligament release and placement of lateral hyperlordotic interbody cages during the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach: a radiographic study in cadavers.J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Nov;17(5):476-85. doi: 10.3171/2012.8.SPINE111121. Epub 2012 Aug 31. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012. PMID: 22938554
-
Preservation or Restoration of Segmental and Regional Spinal Lordosis Using Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion Techniques in Degenerative Lumbar Conditions: A Literature Review.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41 Suppl 8:S50-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001470. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016. PMID: 26825789 Review.
-
Restoration of lumbar lordosis after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.Spine J. 2019 May;19(5):951-958. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Dec 6. Spine J. 2019. PMID: 30529420
Cited by
-
Restoring spinopelvic harmony with lateral lumbar interbody fusion: is it a realistic goal?J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;6(4):639-649. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-605. J Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 33447666 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Laterally Placed Expandable versus Static Interbody Spacers: A 1-Year Follow-Up Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study.Asian Spine J. 2021 Feb;15(1):89-96. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0260. Epub 2020 Jun 12. Asian Spine J. 2021. PMID: 32521948 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Expandable Versus Static Interbody Spacers via MIS LLIF: A 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study.Global Spine J. 2020 Dec;10(8):998-1005. doi: 10.1177/2192568219886278. Epub 2019 Oct 29. Global Spine J. 2020. PMID: 32875829 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of staged lateral lumbar interbody fusion combined two-stage posterior screw fixation and two osteotomy strategies for adult degeneration scoliosis: a retrospective comparative study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 May 16;24(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06449-z. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 37189086 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparative Study of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.Asian Spine J. 2015 Oct;9(5):668-74. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.5.668. Epub 2015 Sep 22. Asian Spine J. 2015. PMID: 26435782 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Park Y, Ha JW. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32(5):537–543. - PubMed
-
- Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR, II, Glassman SD, Johnson JR. Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—Series A. 2003;85(11):2089–2092. - PubMed
-
- Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Oda T, Haku T, Yamamoto T, Iwasaki M. Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2006;4(4):304–309. - PubMed
-
- Anand N, Baron EM, Thaiyananthan G, Khalsa K, Goldstein TB. Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study. Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques. 2008;21(7):459–467. - PubMed
-
- Anand N, Rosemann R, Khalsa B, Baron EM. Mid-term to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis. Neurosurgical Focus. 2010;28(3, article E6) - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources