Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;204(3):339-346.e5.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.11.008.

Trials and tribulations: the professional development of surgical trialists

Anna F Jarman  1 , Nelda P Wray, Danielle M Wenner, Carol M Ashton
Affiliations

Trials and tribulations: the professional development of surgical trialists

Anna F Jarman et al. Am J Surg. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Regulatory and professional bodies issue an ever-increasing number of guidance documents on the ethics and methods of clinical trials, but the quality of clinical trials of invasive therapeutic procedures continues to be a concern. We interviewed aspiring and accomplished surgical trialists to understand how they use guidance documents and other resources in their work.

Methods: We performed a qualitative research study involving semistructured interviews of a diverse sample of 15 surgical trialists.

Results: Professional development as a surgical trialist was haphazard, inefficient, and marked by avoidable mistakes. Four types of resources played constructive roles: formal education; written materials on clinical trials; experience with actual trials; and interpersonal interactions with peers, experts, collaborators, and mentors. Recommendations for improvement centered on education, mentoring, networking, participating in trials, and facilitation by department chairs.

Conclusions: The haphazard and unstructured nature of the current system is adding unnecessarily to the numerous challenges faced by surgical trialists.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Solomon MJ, McLeod RS. Surgery and the randomised controlled trial: past, present and future. Med J Aust. 1998;169:380–3. - PubMed
    1. Horton R. Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers. Lancet. 1996;347:984–5. - PubMed
    1. Panesar SS, Thakrar R, Athanasiou T, et al. Comparison of reports of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in surgical journals: literature review. J R Soc Med. 2006;99:470–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sadr-Azodi O, Andrén-Sandberg A. The quality of randomized clinical trials in the field of surgery: studies on laparoscopic versus open appendectomy as an example. Dig Surg. 2009;26:351–7. - PubMed
    1. Agha R, Cooper D, Muir G. The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2007;5:413–22. - PubMed

Publication types