Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 24:12:198.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-198.

Chagasic patients are able to respond against a viral antigen from influenza virus

Affiliations

Chagasic patients are able to respond against a viral antigen from influenza virus

Paola Lasso et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiological agent of Chagas' disease, is an obligate intracellular parasite which induces a CD8+ T cell immune response with secretion of cytokines and release of cytotoxic granules. Although an immune-suppressive effect of T. cruzi on the acute phase of the disease has been described, little is known about the capacity of CD8+ T cell from chronic chagasic patients to respond to a non-T. cruzi microbial antigen.

Methods: In the present paper, the frequency, phenotype and the functional activity of the CD8+ T cells specific from Flu-MP*, an influenza virus epitope, were determined in 13 chagasic patients and 5 healthy donors.

Results: The results show that Flu-MP* peptide specific CD8+ T cells were found with similar frequencies in both groups. In addition, Flu-MP* specific CD8+ T cells were distributed in the early or intermediate/late differentiation stages without showing enrichment of a specific sub-population. The mentioned Flu-MP* specific CD8+ T cells from chagasic patients were predominately TEM (CCR7- CD62L-), producing IL-2, IFNγ, CD107a/b and perforin, and did not present significant differences when compared with those from healthy donors.

Conclusions: Our results support the hypothesis that there is no CD8+ T cell nonspecific immune-suppression during chronic Chagas disease infection. Nonetheless, other viral antigens must be studied in order to confirm our findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency of CD8+T cells specific for Flu-MP* peptide determined by tetramer staining. (A) Representative flow cytometry dot plot from one HLA-A*0201+ chagasic patient. (B) Frequency of HLA-A*0201+ chagasic patients (white bars) and HLA-A*0201+ healthy donors (grey bars). There were no statistically significant differences between healthy donors and chagasic patients P = 0.21.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Expression of CCR7 and CD62L in Flu-MP* peptide-specific CD8+T cells. (A) Phenotypic characterization by flow cytometry in one representative chagasic patient. (B) Significant differences were observed between central memory (double positive cells) T cells (TCM) and effector memory (double negative cells) T cells (TEM) (P < 0.008) from chagasic patients (white bars) or healthy donors (grey bars). No differences were found when the frequencies of TCM and TEM CD8+ T cells were compared between chagasic patients and healthy donors.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Expression of CD27 and CD28 in Flu-MP* peptide-specific CD8+T cells. (A) Flow cytometry dot plot of CD27 and CD28 expression in one representative chagasic patient. (B) There were no differences between the early differentiation phenotype (CD27+ CD28+) and the intermediate/late differentiation stage (CD27+ CD28-, CD27- CD28-) in CD8+ T cells (P > 0.151). There were no significant differences between the chagasic patients (white bars) and healthy donors (grey bars) when comparing the early phenotype (P = 0.139) with intermediate/late differentiation stage (P = 0.430).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Functional characterization of CD8+ T cells specific for Flu-MP* peptide determinated by flow cytometry. Frequency, mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and integrated mean fluorescence intensity (iMFI) of the perforin (A), CD107a/b (B), IFNγ (C) and IL-2 (D) expression in CD8+ T cells specific for Flu-MP* peptide in chagasic patients (white bars) and healthy donors (grey bars). A representative dot plot of the expression of each studied molecule from one HLA-A*0201+ chagasic patient is shown on the right side.

References

    1. WHO. Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis) fact sheet (revised in June 2010) Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2010;85(34):334–336. - PubMed
    1. Schmunis GA, Yadon ZE. Chagas disease: a Latin American health problem becoming a world health problem. Acta Trop. 2010;115(1–2):14–21. - PubMed
    1. Field V, Gautret P, Schlagenhauf P, Burchard GD, Caumes E, Jensenius M, Castelli F, Gkrania-Klotsas E, Weld L, Lopez-Velez R. et al.Travel and migration associated infectious diseases morbidity in Europe, 2008. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:330. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-330. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prata A. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of Chagas disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001;1(2):92–100. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00065-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Teixeira AR, Hecht MM, Guimaro MC, Sousa AO, Nitz N. Pathogenesis of chagas' disease: parasite persistence and autoimmunity. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24(3):592–630. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00063-10. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms