Infection risk for primary and revision instrumented lumbar spine fusion in the Medicare population
- PMID: 22920611
- DOI: 10.3171/2012.7.SPINE12203
Infection risk for primary and revision instrumented lumbar spine fusion in the Medicare population
Abstract
Object: This retrospective analysis of Medicare administrative data was performed to evaluate the risk of infection following instrumented lumbar fusion over a 10-year follow-up period in the Medicare population. Although infection can be a devastating complication, due to its rarity it is difficult to characterize infection risk except in large patient populations.
Methods: Using ICD-9-CM and CPT4 procedure codes, the Medicare 5% analytical research files for inpatient, outpatient, and physician carrier claims were checked to identify patients who were treated between 1997 and 2009 with lumbar spine fusion in which cages or posterior instrumentation were used. Patients younger than 65 years old were excluded. Patients were followed continuously by using the matching denominator file until they withdrew from Medicare or died. The authors identified 15,069 patients with primary fusion procedures and 605 with revision of instrumented lumbar fusion. Infections were identified by the related ICD-9 codes (998.59 or 996.67) after fusion. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were performed to determine adjusted infection risk for each type of spine procedure (primary vs revision) and surgical approach (anterior, posterior, combined anteroposterior), accounting for patient (for example, age, sex, comorbidities/Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI], and state buy-in) and hospital (census region) characteristics.
Results: At 10 years, the overall infection incidence, including superficial and deep infections, was 8.5% in primary procedures and 12.2% in revisions. Among the factors considered, infection risk within 10 years was most influenced by comorbidities: for a CCI of 5 versus 0, the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) was 2.48 (95% CI 1.93-3.19, p < 0.001); for ≥ 9 versus 2-3 fused vertebrae, the AHR was 2.39 (95% CI 1.20-4.76, p < 0.001); for revision versus primary fusion procedures, the AHR was 1.66 (95% CI 1.28-2.15, p < 0.001). Other significant predictors of 10-year infection risk included diagnosis of obesity (p < 0.001); state buy-in--a proxy for socioeconomic status (p = 0.02); age (p = 0.003); surgical approach (p = 0.03); census region (p = 0.02); and the year of the index procedure (p = 0.03).
Conclusions: Patient comorbidities were the greatest predictor of infection risk for the Medicare population. The high incidence of infection following instrumented fusion warrants increased focus on infection risk mitigation, especially for patients with comorbid conditions.
Similar articles
-
Risk of infection following posterior instrumented lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease in 817 consecutive cases.J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jan;20(1):45-52. doi: 10.3171/2013.10.SPINE1364. Epub 2013 Nov 8. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014. PMID: 24206038
-
The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database does not accurately reflect surgical indications for fusion.J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):984-93. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE131113. Epub 2014 Oct 17. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014. PMID: 25325170
-
The impact of preoperative epidural injections on postoperative infection in lumbar fusion surgery.J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 May;26(5):645-649. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16484. Epub 2017 Mar 14. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017. PMID: 28291411
-
Instrumented fusion in the setting of primary spinal infection.J Neurosurg Sci. 2017 Feb;61(1):64-76. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03302-6. Epub 2015 Apr 15. J Neurosurg Sci. 2017. PMID: 25875732 Review.
-
Metal Hypersensitivity After Spinal Instrumentation: When to Suspect and How to Treat.World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:471-477. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.093. Epub 2020 Apr 24. World Neurosurg. 2020. PMID: 32339728 Review.
Cited by
-
The importance of proximal fusion level selection for outcomes of multi-level lumbar posterolateral fusion.Clin Orthop Surg. 2015 Mar;7(1):77-84. doi: 10.4055/cios.2015.7.1.77. Epub 2015 Feb 10. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015. PMID: 25729522 Free PMC article.
-
Local temperature elevation as a marker of spinal implant infection in an animal model.N Am Spine Soc J. 2021 Sep 3;7:100077. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100077. eCollection 2021 Sep. N Am Spine Soc J. 2021. PMID: 35141642 Free PMC article.
-
Higher Charlson Comorbidity Index Scores are associated with readmission after orthopaedic surgery.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 May;472(5):1638-44. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3394-8. Epub 2013 Nov 26. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014. PMID: 24276857 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Analysis of Primary and Revision Single-Level Lumbar Fusion Surgeries: Predictors, Outcomes, and Clinical Implications Using Big Data.J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 23;14(3):723. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030723. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 39941393 Free PMC article.
-
Vancomycin Antibiotic Prophylaxis Compared to Cefazolin Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infection Following Spine Surgery.Global Spine J. 2025 May 7:21925682251341833. doi: 10.1177/21925682251341833. Online ahead of print. Global Spine J. 2025. PMID: 40336255 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources