Determination of ureter stent appearance on dual-energy computed tomography scan
- PMID: 22921702
- PMCID: PMC3939716
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.005
Determination of ureter stent appearance on dual-energy computed tomography scan
Abstract
Objective: To examine the dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) properties of 7 commonly used ureteral stents to optimize stent selection for calculi monitored using DECT. The use of DECT to evaluate renal and ureteral calculi has recently increased.
Methods: Seven stents were individually placed in a fish bowl phantom and imaged using a Siemens Somatom Definition Flash CT scanner. DECT peak tube potentials of 80 and 140 kVp and 100 and 140 kVp were used, reflecting our current dual-energy protocols. These were compared to 31 in vivo stents of known composition. The data were reconstructed on a multimodality WorkPlace (Siemens) using CT syngo Post-Processing Suite software.
Results: The average patient age was 64 years (range 27-90). The average body mass index was 31.9 kg/m(2) (range 24-51.6). Of the 27 patients, 4 had uric acid stones and 22 had calcium-based stones; 1 patient had undergone renal transplantation. No difference was seen in the dual-energy characterization of stents from the same manufacturer. All imaged Cook and Bard stents had a dual-energy characterization that approached that of calcium stones (blue). All Boston Scientific and Gyrus ACMI stents had a dual-energy characterization resembling that of uric acid stones (red).
Conclusion: The present study evaluated the stent appearance on DECT for various stent manufacturers. This information will aid in the optimal stent selection for patients undergoing treatment of renal calculi and followed up with DECT.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Optimized management of urolithiasis by coloured stent-stone contrast using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT).BMC Urol. 2019 Apr 30;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0459-3. BMC Urol. 2019. PMID: 31039768 Free PMC article.
-
Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience.Invest Radiol. 2008 Feb;43(2):112-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318157a144. Invest Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18197063
-
Evaluation of split-filter dual-energy CT for characterization of urinary stones.Br J Radiol. 2021 Nov 1;94(1127):20210084. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210084. Epub 2021 Oct 7. Br J Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33989046 Free PMC article.
-
Dual-energy CT revisited with multidetector CT: review of principles and clinical applications.Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011 Sep;17(3):181-94. doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.3860-10.0. Epub 2010 Nov 14. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011. PMID: 20945292 Review.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to differentiate uric acid from non-uric acid calculi: systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2791-2801. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06559-0. Epub 2020 Jan 24. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 31980881
Cited by
-
Percutaneous stone removal: new approaches to access and imaging.Curr Urol Rep. 2015 May;16(5):29. doi: 10.1007/s11934-015-0501-2. Curr Urol Rep. 2015. PMID: 25773346 Review.
-
Three-dimensional dual-energy computed tomography for enhancing stone/stent contrasting and stone visualization in urolithiasis.Case Rep Urol. 2013;2013:646087. doi: 10.1155/2013/646087. Epub 2013 Jul 17. Case Rep Urol. 2013. PMID: 23956922 Free PMC article.
-
In vivo comparison of radiation exposure of dual-energy CT versus low-dose CT versus standard CT for imaging urinary calculi.J Endourol. 2015 Feb;29(2):141-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0026. Epub 2014 Sep 17. J Endourol. 2015. PMID: 25058059 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization of ureteral stents by dual-energy computed tomography: Clinical implications.World J Radiol. 2014 Aug 28;6(8):625-8. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i8.625. World J Radiol. 2014. PMID: 25170401 Free PMC article.
-
Complications Subsequent to Urinary Tract Stent Placement: An Overview Focusing on the Imaging of Cancer Patients.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 19;60(2):338. doi: 10.3390/medicina60020338. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 38399625 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Boll DT, Patil NA, Paulson EK, et al. Renal stone assessment with dual-energy multidetector CT and advanced postprocessing techniques: improved characterization of renal stone composition—pilot study. Radiology. 2009;250:813–820. - PubMed
-
- Eiber M, Holzapfel K, Frimberger M, et al. Targeted dual-energy single-source CT for characterisation of urinary calculi: experimental and clinical experience. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:251–258. - PubMed
-
- Eliahou R, Hidas G, Duvdevani M, et al. Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy computer tomography: an emerging application. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010;31:315–320. - PubMed
-
- Graser A, Johnson TRC, Bader M, et al. Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:112–119. - PubMed
-
- Matlaga BR, Kawamoto S, Fishman E. Dual source computer tomography: a novel technique to determine stone composition. J Urol. 2008;5:1164–1168. - PubMed