Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;41(5):1577-86.
doi: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1594. Epub 2012 Aug 21.

STAT3 signal transduction through interleukin-22 in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Affiliations

STAT3 signal transduction through interleukin-22 in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Lutfun Naher et al. Int J Oncol. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Interleukin (IL)-22 is a member of the IL-10 family. Its main targets are epithelial cells, not immune cells. We examined IL-22 signal transduction in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cells. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that IL-22R was expressed more highly in OSCC compared to normal regions. An IL-22R signal was also observed in metastatic OSCC cells in the lymph node. RT-PCR showed that the human OSCC cell lines MISK81-5, HSC-3, HSC-4, SAS and SQUU-B expressed IL-22 receptor chains. Immunoblotting showed that IL-22 induced a transient tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3 (pY705-STAT3) in MISK81-5 cells. The change in the serine phosphorylation of STAT3 was subtle during the examination periods. Simultaneously, pY705-STAT3 activation in HSC-3 cells was undetectable after IL-22 stimulation. Immunocytochemistry demonstrated that IL-22 induced the translocation of phosphorylated STAT3 into the nucleus of MISK81-5 cells. IL-22 temporarily upregulated the expression of anti-apoptotic and mitogenic genes such as Bcl-x, survivin and c-Myc, as well as SOCS3. IL-22 transiently activated ERK1/2 and induced a delayed phosphorylation of p38 MAP kinase, but negligibly involved the activation of NF-κB in MISK81-5 cells. MISK81-5 and SQUU-B cells treated with IL-22 showed mild cellular proliferation. MISK81-5, HSC-4 and SAS cells treated with IL-22 downregulated the keratinocyte differentiation-related genes compared with unstimulated cells. Conversely, STAT3 suppression by STAT3 siRNA strongly disrupted the downregulation of these genes by IL-22, but it did not significantly affect the activation of ERK1/2 by IL-22. The OSCC cells used in this study upregulated the expression of SERPINB3/4 (SCCA1/2), well-known SCC markers, following treatment with IL-22. These results indicate that IL-22 differentially activates the STAT3 signaling system depending on the type of OSCC. IL-22 may therefore play a role in tumor growth, cell differentiation and progression through STAT3-dependent and -independent pathways.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
IL-22R is expressed in the OSCC of the extirpated samples and OSCC cell lines. (A) IL-22R immunostaining was observed in four of the seven extirpated samples, including some normal regions. The immunoreactive intensity for IL-22 was increased in the OSCC region (right side; *) compared with that in the normal oral epithelium (left side). Scale bar, 100 μm. (B) Metastatic carcinoma cells in the cervical lymph node (**) showed strongly positive signals for IL-22R (arrow). Scale bar, 1 mm. (C) IL-22R positive signals in metastatic carcinoma cells in the cervical lymph node (**) in another case. Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) IL-10R2 and IL-22R1 mRNA expressions were examined by semiquantitative RT-PCR. β-actin was used as an internal control.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
IL-22 induces transient STAT3 phosphorylation and the phosphorylation of several members of the MAPK pathways in MISK81-5, oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. (A) MISK81-5 and (B) HSC-3 cells were incubated with IL-22 (20 ng/ml) or IL-6 (20 ng/ml) for varying times up to 120 min. (A) IL-22 and IL-6 induced pY705-STAT3 in MISK81-5 cells within 15 and 5 min, respectively. IL-22 induced transient tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3 in MISK81-5 cells with similar kinetics to IL-6. IL-22 and IL-6 induced subtle changes in pS727-STAT3 within the tested time periods. IL-22 induced a transient activation of ERK1/2 in MISK81-5 cells and also induced a delayed phosphorylation of p38 MAP kinase, similar to IL-6. (B) In HSC-3 cells, pY705-STAT3 was undetectable after IL-22 stimulation, although transient pY705-STAT3 expression was induced after IL-6 stimulation. IL-22 and IL-6 induced the transient serine phosphorylation of STAT3. HSC-3 cells stimulated with IL-6 showed activation of ERK1/2 and p38 MAP kinases similar to that in MISK81-5 cells. However, the activation in HSC-3 cells was undetectable after IL-22 treatment. All findings represent the results of three independent experiments.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
IL-22 translocates pSTAT3 into the nucleus in MISK81-5 cells. (A) MISK81-5 cells were either untreated as a control (left) or treated with IL-6. IL-6 led to the rapid translocation of most of the STAT3 into the nucleus of MISK81-5 cells within 5 min. After 30 min, STAT3 was noted in the cytoplasm again. (B) MISK81-5 or (C) HSC-3 cells were either untreated as a control (left) or treated with IL-22 or IL-6 for 30 min. (B) The translocation of pSTAT3 into the nucleus was noted in MISK81-5 cells treated with IL-22 as well as with IL-6 or EGF. (C) In HSC-3 cells, the translocation of pSTAT3 into the nucleus was not observed after IL-22 stimulation, but trans-location was induced by IL-6. Alexa Fluor® IgG was used as the secondary antibody (red); nuclei were counter-stained with DAPI (blue); EGF was used as control for stimulating the activation of STAT3. (A) Scale bar, 30 μm; (B and C) scale bar, 10 μm.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
IL-22 transiently induces the expression of anti-apoptotic and mitogenic genes in MISK81-5 cells. MISK81-5 cells were treated with IL-22 (20 ng/ml) for various times as indicated. (A) Bcl-xL, (B) survivin, (C) c-Myc, (D) cyclin D1 and (E) SOCS3 were targeted as STAT3-downstream genes. Bcl-xL, c-Myc and SOCS3 exhibited a peak expression at 30, 60 and 60 min after IL-22 stimulation, respectively. However, c-Myc gene expression was significantly decreased at 120 min. IL-22 significantly increased the gene expression of survivin at 60 and 120 min and decreased cyclin D1 at 30 and 120 min. (F) B2M was used as a reference gene. The SOCS gene expression in (G) HSC-4, (H) SAS and (I) SQUU-B cells treated with IL-22 (20 ng/ml) for various times is shown as indicated. Significant differences between the stimulated and unstimulated samples are indicated with single or double asterisks (*p<0.05; **p<0.01).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
IL-22 affects MISK81-5 cell proliferation in vitro, but is negligibly associated with upregulation of the cellular NF-κB activation. (A) MISK81-5, HSC-4, SAS and SQUU-B cells were incubated with or without IL-22 (20 ng/ml) for 48 h. The viability of MISK81-5 and SQUU-B cells treated with IL-22 was increased by 1.3- and 1.1-fold in comparison to the control cells, respectively. A significant difference was noted between the stimulated and control samples (**p<0.01). (B) Stably transfected cells, MISK-pGL4-NF-κB cells were stimulated with TNF-α (50 or 100 ng/ml), IL-6 (20 or 50 ng/ml) or IL-22 (20 or 50 ng/ml) or with control medium. A luciferase assay was performed after 24 h. Each ratio is indicated as the relative expression compared to the unstimulated control samples, and indicates the mean ± SD (bars) of three values from one representative experiment. Significant differences in the transcriptional activity are indicated with double asterisks (**p<0.01).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
IL-22 treatment reduces the expression of keratinocyte differentiation-related genes. (A) The expression of loricrin (LOR), involucrin (IVL), keratin 1 (KRT1), keratin 10 (KRT10), keratin 5 (KRT5) and keratin 14 (KRT14) was compared between MISK81-5 cells stimulated with IL-22 for 24 h and unstimulated cells. (B) The expression of IVL, KRT1 and KRT10 was compared between HSC-4 cells stimulated with IL-22 for 24 h and unstimulated cells. (C) The expression of KRT1 was significantly decreased in the IL-22-treated SAS cells compared to that in unstimulated cells. Significant differences in the gene expression are indicated by double asterisks (**p<0.01).
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
STAT3 siRNA inhibits IL-22-induced reduction of KRT1 expression, but it has little impact on pERK. (A) siRNA selectively reduced the gene expression in the MISK81-5 cells at 30 h after siRNA transfection. Significant differences in the gene expression are indicated by double asterisks (**p<0.01). B2M was used as a reference gene. (B) An immunoblot analysis also revealed that GAPDH and STAT3 siRNAs cause a depletion of the GAPDH and STAT3 protein levels in the MISK81-5 cells, respectively. (C) At 30 h before IL-22 stimulation, the MISK81-5 cells were transfected with siRNA. The expression of B2M, GAPDH, STAT3 and KRT1 was compared between MISK81-5 cells after IL-22 stimulation for 24 h and unstimulated cells (*p<0.05; **p<0.01). (D) The downregulation of KRT1 expression by IL-22 was inhibited in the SAS cells transfected with a siRNA for STAT3 and in unstimulated cells. Significant differences in the gene expression are indicated by single or double asterisks (*p<0.05; **p<0.01). (E) At 30 h after siRNA transfection, the MISK81-5 cells were treated with IL-22 for 10 min. Total cell lysates (10 μg/sample) were analyzed by immunoblotting with an antibody against pY705-STAT3. The membrane was repeatedly reprobed and immunoblotted with an anti-pERK1/2, anti-total STAT3, or an anti-ERK antibody and then with an anti-β-actin antibody. w/o, sample without siRNA treatment; C, sample treated with negative control siRNA; P, sample treated with GAPDH siRNA as a positive control; S, sample treated with STAT3 siRNA.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
IL-22 treatment induces the upregulated expression of SERPINB3/4 genes in OSCC cells. The expression of the (A) SERPINB3 and (B) SERPINB4 genes was increased in the MISK81-5, HSC-4, SAS and SQUU-B cells stimulated with IL-22 (20 or 50 ng/ml) compared with those cultured in the control medium. Significant differences in the gene expression are indicated by single or double asterisks (*p<0.05; **p<0.01).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chidzonga MM, Mahomva L. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, maxillary antrum and lip in a Zimbabwean population: a descriptive epidemiological study. Oral Oncol. 2006;42:184–189. - PubMed
    1. Chidzonga MM. Oral malignant neoplasia: a survey of 428 cases in two Zimbabwean hospitals. Oral Oncol. 2006;42:177–183. - PubMed
    1. Dimery IW, Hong WK. Overview of combined modality therapies for head and neck cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:95–111. - PubMed
    1. Schantz SP, Yu GP. Head and neck cancer incidence trends in young Americans, 1973–1997, with a special analysis for tongue cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:268–274. - PubMed
    1. Llewellyn CD, Linklater K, Bell J, Johnson NW, Warnakulasuriya KA. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity in patients aged 45 years and under: a descriptive analysis of 116 cases diagnosed in the South East of England from 1990 to 1997. Oral Oncol. 2003;39:106–114. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms