Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;61(9):2199-204.
doi: 10.2337/db12-0052.

Why Do SGLT2 inhibitors inhibit only 30-50% of renal glucose reabsorption in humans?

Affiliations

Why Do SGLT2 inhibitors inhibit only 30-50% of renal glucose reabsorption in humans?

Jiwen Jim Liu et al. Diabetes. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition is a novel and promising treatment for diabetes under late-stage clinical development. It generally is accepted that SGLT2 mediates 90% of renal glucose reabsorption. However, SGLT2 inhibitors in clinical development inhibit only 30-50% of the filtered glucose load. Why are they unable to inhibit 90% of glucose reabsorption in humans? We will try to provide an explanation to this puzzle in this perspective analysis of the unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of SGLT2 inhibitors in clinical trials and examine possible mechanisms and molecular properties that may be responsible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
SGLT2 inhibitors in late-stage clinical trials.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Plasma dapagliflozin concentration as a function of time following an oral dose of 20 mg in healthy volunteers. Conc., concentration. Modified from Fig. 4 of Komoroski et al. (23).
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Schematic PK/PD graphs of empagliflozin (BI 10773). UGE rate–time profiles are shown in dotted line (10 mg-PD), dashed line (100 mg-PD), and dashed-dotted line (400 mg-PD). Plasma concentration–time profiles are shown in solid lines. Three representative doses are shown: 10, 100, and 400 mg. Conc., concentration. Modified from Port et al. (22) and Dugi and Mark (26).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011 [Internet]. Atlanta, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2011.pdf Accessed 11 February 2011
    1. DeFronzo RA. Banting lecture. From the triumvirate to the omnious octet: A new paradigm for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 2009;58:773–795 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998;352:837–853, 853–865 - PubMed
    1. Brown JB, Conner C, Nichols GA. Secondary failure of metformin monotherapy in clinical practice. Diabetes Care 2010;33:501–506 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, et al. Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2545–2559 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types