Comparative study of ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve blockade with continuous epidural analgesia for pain relief following total knee replacement
- PMID: 22923827
- PMCID: PMC3425288
- DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.98776
Comparative study of ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve blockade with continuous epidural analgesia for pain relief following total knee replacement
Abstract
Background: Regional analgesia is widely used for total knee replacement surgeries (TKR) as it has lesser side-effects and better analgesic efficacy when compared with traditional oral analgesics. Peripheral nerve blockade has also been utilized, including continuous infusion techniques. With the use of ultrasound, the needle and catheter placement can be done accurately under real-time guidance. This may prove a more suitable approach compared with the epidural technique.
Aims: Post-operative analgesia in TKR patients was compared between continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) and continuous femoral block (CFB) techniques. VAS scores and use of rescue analgesic were used as parameters. Secondary aims included comparison of rehabilitation scores and side-effects in the form hypotension, vomiting, itching and urinary retention.
Settings and design: Randomised, controlled, non-blinded study done in a tertiary care private hospital.
Methods: Forty-two patients fulfilling the study criteria were randomised into the CEA and CFB groups. In total, four patients: three in the CFB group and one in the CEA group, were excluded because of catheter migration.
Statistical analysis: Mean VAS score at 6, 6-24, 24-48 and 48-72 h were considered. Significance was assessed at the 5% level.
Results and conclusion: VAS scores were significantly high (P=0.001) in the femoral group at 6 h, after which there was a declining trend, and scores were essentially similar from 24 h. Common side-effects were more common in the CEA group. Our study shows that CFB gives equivalent analgesia compared with CEA in TKR patients with clinically meaningful decrease in side-effects.
Keywords: Continuous femoral catheter; epidural; regional analgesia; total knee replacement; ultrasound.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Evans H, Steele SM, Nielsen KC, Tucker MS, Klein SM. Peripheral nerve blocks and continuous catheter techniques. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2005;23:141–62. - PubMed
-
- Fowler SJ, Symons J, Sabato S, Myles PS. Epidural analgesia compared with peripheral nerve blockade after major knee surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:154–64. - PubMed
-
- Richman JM, Liu SS, Courpas G, Wong R, Rowlingson AJ, McGready J, et al. Does continuous peripheral nerve block provide superior pain control to opioids? A meta-analysis Anesth Analg. 2006;102:248–57. - PubMed
-
- Liu SS, Ngeow J, John RS. Evidence Basis for Ultrasound-Guided Block Characteristics: Onset, Quality, and Duration. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:S26–36. - PubMed
-
- Barrington MJ, Olive D, Low K, Scott DA, Brittain J, Choong P. Continuous Femoral Nerve Blockade or Epidural Analgesia After Total Knee Replacement: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:1824–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
