Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;168(1):238-52.
doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02176.x.

Reperfusion-induced myocardial dysfunction is prevented by endogenous annexin-A1 and its N-terminal-derived peptide Ac-ANX-A1(2-26)

Affiliations

Reperfusion-induced myocardial dysfunction is prevented by endogenous annexin-A1 and its N-terminal-derived peptide Ac-ANX-A1(2-26)

Chengxue Qin et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Annexin-A1 (ANX-A1) is an endogenous, glucocorticoid-regulated anti-inflammatory protein. The N-terminal-derived peptide Ac-ANX-A1(2-26) preserves cardiomyocyte viability, but the impact of ANX-A1-peptides on cardiac contractility is unknown. We now test the hypothesis that ANX-A1 preserves post-ischaemic recovery of left ventricular (LV) function.

Experimental approach: Ac-ANX-A1(2-26) was administered on reperfusion, to adult rat cardiomyocytes as well as hearts isolated from rats, wild-type mice and mice deficient in endogenous ANX-A1 (ANX-A1(-/-)). Myocardial viability and recovery of LV function were determined.

Key results: Ischaemia-reperfusion markedly impaired both cardiomyocyte viability and recovery of LV function by 60%. Treatment with exogenous Ac-ANX-A1(2-26) at the onset of reperfusion prevented cardiomyocyte injury and significantly improved recovery of LV function, in both intact rat and wild-type mouse hearts. Ac-ANX-A1(2-26) cardioprotection was abolished by either formyl peptide receptor (FPR)-nonselective or FPR1-selective antagonists, Boc2 and cyclosporin H, but was relatively insensitive to the FPR2-selective antagonist QuinC7. ANX-A1-induced cardioprotection was associated with increased phosphorylation of the cell survival kinase Akt. ANX-A1(-/-) exaggerated impairment of post-ischaemic recovery of LV function, in addition to selective LV FPR1 down-regulation.

Conclusions and implications: These data represent the first evidence that ANX-A1 affects myocardial function. Our findings suggest ANX-A1 is an endogenous regulator of post-ischaemic recovery of LV function. Furthermore, the ANX-A1-derived peptide Ac-ANX-A1(2-26) on reperfusion rescues LV function, probably via activation of FPR1. ANX-A1-based therapies may thus represent a novel clinical approach for the prevention and treatment of myocardial reperfusion injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Ac-ANX-A12–26 (0.3 μM) prevents adult rat cardiomyocyte hypoxia–reoxygenation (H–R) injury in vitro (assessed by measuring LDH activity) whether present for the full duration of H–R (n = 11) or only post-H–R (n = 15 cardiomyocyte preparations). (B) H–R-induced loss of cardiomyocyte viability (assessed by measuring trypan blue exclusion) was also prevented by Ac-ANX-A12–26 at both time points (n = 8 cardiomyocyte preparations). *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 versus paired untreated control, and #P < 0.05 and ###P < 0.001 Ac-ANX-A12–26-treated versus untreated H–R cardiomyocytes from the same cardiomyocyte preparation on SNK.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ac-ANX-A12–26 (0.3 μM) addition at the onset of reperfusion attenuates I–R-induced impairment of myocardial viability and LV systolic function in rat isolated heart ex vivo. (A) Ac-ANX-A12–26 decreases the I–R-stimulated release of LDH from the myocardium (P < 0.005, untreated I–R, n = 16 vs. sham n = 4, and P < 0.05 untreated I–R vs. Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R, n = 15, on two-way anova). The untreated I–R group also had a significantly increased myocardial release of LDH (as assessed by AUC analysis; P < 0.05), a trend that was absent in the presence of Ac-ANX-A12–26 (P = 0.08, right panel). (B) Ac-ANX-A12–26 accelerates recovery of LVDP up to 30 min post reperfusion (P < 0.001 untreated I–R, n = 15 vs. sham n = 9, and P < 0.001 vs. Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R, n = 17, on two-way anova). The untreated I–R group also had a significantly impaired recovery of LVDP on AUC analysis (P < 0.001), which was prevented by Ac-ANX-A12–26 (P < 0.05, upper inset). Ac-ANX-A12–26–induced recovery of LVDP after 2 or 30 min reperfusion is shown in the lower inset (both P = NS). (C) Ac-ANX-A12–26 accelerates recovery of LV + dP/dt up to 30 min post reperfusion (P < 0.001 untreated I–R vs. sham, and P < 0.001 vs. Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R, by two-way anova). The untreated I–R group had a significantly impaired recovery of LV + dP/dt on AUC analysis (P < 0.05), which was prevented by Ac-ANX-A12–26 (upper inset). Ac-ANX-A12–26 significantly improved recovery of LV + dP/dt after 2 min reperfusion (P < 0.05, lower inset). *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 untreated I–R versus sham; #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.001 Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R versus untreated I–R rat hearts at each time point on SNK respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ac-ANX-A12–26 (0.3 μM) attenuates I–R-induced impairment of (A) LVRPP and (B) LV-dP/dt up to 30 min post reperfusion in the rat isolated heart ex vivo. Recovery of RPP and LV-dP/dt on AUC analysis is shown on the upper inset of each panel, and relative recovery of both parameters after 2 and 30 min reperfusion on the lower insets. (C) ANX-A12–26 also increases phosphorylation of the cell survival kinase, Akt (P < 0.05 ANX-A12–26 I–R, n = 14 vs. untreated I–R rat hearts n = 10, left-hand panel) and of the SERCA regulator, phospholamban (P < 0.05 ANX-A12–26 I–R, n = 4 vs. untreated I–R rat hearts, n = 3, right-hand panel), in rat hearts subjected to I–R. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005 and ***P < 0.001 untreated I–R versus sham; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R versus untreated I–R rat hearts at each time point on SNK respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Role of FPR subtypes in Ac-ANX-A12–26 cardioprotection in the rat isolated heart ex vivo, on the time course of protection in the presence of Ac-ANX-A12–26 (0.3 μM), alone or in the presence of the non-selective FPR-antagonist Boc2 (10 μM), the FPR1-selective antagonist CsH (1 μM), or the FPR2-selective antagonist QuinC7 (10 μM) during reperfusion. (A) Both Boc2 and CsH (both P < 0.05, n = 6) significantly inhibited Ac-ANX-A12–26–induced protection of myocardial LDH release, but QuinC7 had no effect (P = NS, n = 6). Similar attenuation of the Ac-ANX-A12–26 effect by Boc2 and CsH, but not QuinC7, was also evident on recovery of both (B) LVDP and (C) LV + dP/dt. The AUC results for Ac-ANX-A12–26 cardioprotection ± FPR antagonists are also shown, on (D) LDH release, (E) LVDP and (F) LV + dP/dt. Sham n = 9, untreated I–R, n = 15 and Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R, n = 17. *P < 0.05 untreated I–R versus sham; #P < 0.05 Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R versus untreated I–R rat hearts; §P < 0.05, §§P < 0.01 and §§§P < 0.001 antagonist + Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R versus Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R and P < 0.05, ††P < 0.01 and †††P < 0.001 antagonist + Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R versus untreated I–R rat hearts respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
FPR antagonism attenuates the cardioprotective effects of Ac-ANX-A12–26 on recovery of both (A) RPP and (B) LV-dP/dt (sham n = 9, untreated I–R n = 15, Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R n = 17 and all antagonist groups n = 6). Recovery of (C) RPP and (D) LV-dP/dt on AUC analysis is also shown, as well as (E) Ac-ANX-A12–26-induced phosphorylation of Akt (all n = 5). *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.005 untreated I–R versus sham; ##P < 0.01 Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R versus untreated I–R rat hearts, §P < 0.05, §§P < 0.005 and §§§P < 0.001 antagonist + Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R versus Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R and ††P < 0.01 and †††P < 0.001 antagonist + Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R versus untreated I–R rat hearts respectively.
Figure 6
Figure 6
ANX-A12–26 (0.3 μM) addition at the onset of reperfusion attenuates I–R-induced impairment of LV systolic function in the isolated wild-type mouse heart ex vivo. Recovery of LVDP, LV + dP/dt and LV-dP/dt on AUC analysis is shown on the upper inset of each panel, and the relative impairment (i.e. the relative reduction in LV function as % of baseline) of all parameters after 2 and 30 min reperfusion are shown on the lower insets. (A) Ac-ANX-A12–26 accelerates recovery of LVDP up to 40 min post reperfusion (P < 0.001 untreated I–R, n = 11 versus sham n = 10 and P < 0.001 versus ANX-A12–26–treated I–R, n = 6, both on two-way anova). Untreated I–R also significantly impaired recovery of LVDP on AUC analysis (P < 0.05), which tended to be prevented by Ac-ANX-A12–26 (P = 0.1, upper inset). The impairment in recovery of LVDP in untreated versus Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated I–R was not different after 2 min reperfusion (P = NS), but a greater recovery of LVDP in Ac-ANX-A12–26–treated hearts was evident after 40 min reperfusion (P = 0.06, lower inset). (B) Ac-ANX-A12–26 accelerates recovery of LV + dP/dt up to 40 min post reperfusion (untreated I–R, n = 11 P < 0.001 versus sham, n = 10 and P = 0.089 versus ANX-A12–26–treated I–R, n = 6, on two-way anova). Untreated I–R significantly impaired recovery of LV + dP/dt on AUC analysis (P < 0.05), which tended to be prevented by Ac-ANX-A12–26 (P = 0.08, upper inset). Ac-ANX-A12–26 tended to improve recovery of LV + dP/dt after 40 min reperfusion (P = 0.08) but not after 2 min reperfusion (P = NS, lower inset). (C) Ac-ANX-A12–26 accelerates recovery of LV-dP/dt up to 40 min post reperfusion (untreated I–R n = 11 P < 0.001 vs. sham n = 10 and P < 0.001 vs. ANX-A12–26–treated I–R n = 6, both by two-way anova). Untreated I–R significantly impaired recovery of LV-dP/dt on AUC analysis (P < 0.05), which Ac-ANX-A12–26 tended to prevent (P = 0.1, upper inset). Ac-ANX-A12–26 tended to improve recovery of LV-dP/dt after 40 min reperfusion (P = 0.1) but not after 2 min reperfusion (P = NS, lower inset). *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 untreated I–R versus sham and #P < 0.05 and ###P < 0.001 ANX-A12–26–treated I–R versus untreated I–R mouse hearts respectively.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Deficiency of endogenous ANX-A1 exaggerates I–R-induced impairment of LV systolic function in the intact mouse heart ex vivo. Recovery of LVDP, LV + dP/dt and LV-dP/dt on AUC analysis is shown on the upper inset of each panel, and the relative impairment (i.e. the relative reduction in LV function as % of baseline) of all parameters after 2 and 40 min reperfusion are shown on the lower insets. (A) The time course of recovery of LVDP is significantly impaired in ANX-A1−/− (n = 14) versus ANX-A1+/+ mouse hearts (n = 11, P < 0.001 on two-way anova). ANX-A1−/− also significantly exaggerated the impaired recovery of LVDP on AUC analysis (P < 0.05, upper inset), which was evident at both 2 and 40 min reperfusion (both P < 0.05, lower inset). (B) ANX-A1−/− also significantly delayed recovery of LV + dP/dt compared with ANX-A1+/+ mouse hearts (P < 0.0001 on two-way anova), which was also evident on AUC analysis (P < 0.05, upper inset), and at both 2 and 40 min reperfusion (both P < 0.05, lower inset). (C) ANX-A1−/− similarly delayed recovery of LV-dP/dt compared with ANX-A1+/+ mouse hearts (P < 0.001 on two-way anova), which was also evident on AUC analysis (P < 0.05, upper inset), and at both 2 and 40 min reperfusion (both P < 0.05, lower inset). ψP < 0.001 and ψψψP < 0.001 untreated I–R ANX-A1+/+ versus untreated I–R ANX-A1−/− mouse hearts.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Deficiency of ANX-A1 (A) suppresses phosphorylation of the cell survival kinase Akt following I–R in mouse hearts (both n = 6, ψψP < 0.01) and (B) down-regulates gene expression of FPR1; FPR2 expression is unaffected (n = 4–5 per group).

References

    1. Burli RW, Xu H, Zou XM, Muller K, Golden J, Frohn M, et al. Potent hFPRL1 (ALXR) agonists as potential anti-inflammatory agents. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2006;16:3713–3718. - PubMed
    1. D'Amico M, Di Filippo C, La M, Solito E, McLean PG, Flower RJ, et al. Lipocortin 1 reduces myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by affecting local leukocyte recruitment. FASEB J. 2000;14:1867–1869. - PubMed
    1. Dreier R, Schmid KW, Gerke V, Riehemann K. Differential expression of annexins I, II and IV in human tissues: an immunohistochemical study. Histochem Cell Biol. 1998;110:137–148. - PubMed
    1. Dufton N, Perretti M. Therapeutic anti-inflammatory potential of formyl-peptide receptor agonists. Pharmacol Ther. 2010;127:175–188. - PubMed
    1. Dufton N, Hannon R, Brancaleone V, Dalli J, Patel HB, Gray M, et al. Anti-inflammatory role of the murine formyl-peptide receptor 2: ligand-specific effects on leukocyte responses and experimental inflammation. J Immunol. 2010;184:2611–2619. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms