Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease
- PMID: 22924638
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361
Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease
Erratum in
- N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov;367(18):1768. Mobius-Winckler, Sven [corrected to Möbius-Winkler, Sven]
Abstract
Background: The preferred initial treatment for patients with stable coronary artery disease is the best available medical therapy. We hypothesized that in patients with functionally significant stenoses, as determined by measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus the best available medical therapy would be superior to the best available medical therapy alone.
Methods: In patients with stable coronary artery disease for whom PCI was being considered, we assessed all stenoses by measuring FFR. Patients in whom at least one stenosis was functionally significant (FFR, ≤0.80) were randomly assigned to FFR-guided PCI plus the best available medical therapy (PCI group) or the best available medical therapy alone (medical-therapy group). Patients in whom all stenoses had an FFR of more than 0.80 were entered into a registry and received the best available medical therapy. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization.
Results: Recruitment was halted prematurely after enrollment of 1220 patients (888 who underwent randomization and 332 enrolled in the registry) because of a significant between-group difference in the percentage of patients who had a primary end-point event: 4.3% in the PCI group and 12.7% in the medical-therapy group (hazard ratio with PCI, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19 to 0.53; P<0.001). The difference was driven by a lower rate of urgent revascularization in the PCI group than in the medical-therapy group (1.6% vs. 11.1%; hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.30; P<0.001); in particular, in the PCI group, fewer urgent revascularizations were triggered by a myocardial infarction or evidence of ischemia on electrocardiography (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.43; P<0.001). Among patients in the registry, 3.0% had a primary end-point event.
Conclusions: In patients with stable coronary artery disease and functionally significant stenoses, FFR-guided PCI plus the best available medical therapy, as compared with the best available medical therapy alone, decreased the need for urgent revascularization. In patients without ischemia, the outcome appeared to be favorable with the best available medical therapy alone. (Funded by St. Jude Medical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01132495.).
Comment in
-
Which is more enduring--FAME or COURAGE?N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):1059-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1208620. Epub 2012 Aug 27. N Engl J Med. 2012. PMID: 22924622 No abstract available.
-
FFR-guided revascularization versus medical therapy-the debate goes on.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012 Nov;9(11):612. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2012.135. Epub 2012 Sep 11. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22965111 No abstract available.
-
Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI in stable coronary disease.N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 13;367(24):2355; author reply 2356. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1212344. N Engl J Med. 2012. PMID: 23234520 No abstract available.
-
Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI in stable coronary disease.N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 13;367(24):2355-6; author reply 2356. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1212344. N Engl J Med. 2012. PMID: 23234521 No abstract available.
-
Learning from FAME: the need for sham controls in trials of stable coronary disease.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar;7(3):342-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.001. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 24650413 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous