Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 27:12:277.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-277.

Factors influencing consumer adoption of USB-based Personal Health Records in Taiwan

Affiliations

Factors influencing consumer adoption of USB-based Personal Health Records in Taiwan

Wen-Shan Jian et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Usually patients receive healthcare services from multiple hospitals, and consequently their healthcare data are dispersed over many facilities' paper and electronic-based record systems. Therefore, many countries have encouraged the research on data interoperability, access, and patient authorization. This study is an important part of a national project to build an information exchange environment for cross-hospital digital medical records carried out by the Department of Health (DOH) of Taiwan in May 2008. The key objective of the core project is to set up a portable data exchange environment in order to enable people to maintain and own their essential health information.This study is aimed at exploring the factors influencing behavior and adoption of USB-based Personal Health Records (PHR) in Taiwan.

Methods: Quota sampling was used, and structured questionnaires were distributed to the outpatient department at ten medical centers which participated in the DOH project to establish the information exchange environment across hospitals. A total of 3000 questionnaires were distributed and 1549 responses were collected, out of those 1465 were valid, accumulating the response rate to 48.83%.

Results: 1025 out of 1465 respondents had expressed their willingness to apply for the USB-PHR. Detailed analysis of the data reflected that there was a remarkable difference in the "usage intention" between the PHR adopters and non-adopters (χ2 =182.4, p < 0.001). From the result of multivariate logistic regression analyses, we found the key factors affecting patients' adoption pattern were Usage Intention (OR, 9.43, 95%C.I., 5.87-15.16), Perceived Usefulness (OR, 1.60; 95%C.I., 1.11-2.29) and Subjective Norm (OR, 1.47; 95%C.I., 1.21-1.78).

Conclusions: Higher Usage Intentions, Perceived Usefulness and Subjective Norm of patients were found to be the key factors influencing PHR adoption. Thus, we suggest that government and hospitals should promote the potential usefulness of PHR, and physicians should encourage patients' to adopt the PHR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Research model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The study design.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Showing information collection from different hospitals.
Figure 4
Figure 4
User Interface of PHR displaying lab results.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McDonald CJ, Overhage JM, Dexter PR. et al.Canopy computing: using the Web in clinical practice. JAMA. 1998;280:1325–1329. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1325. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands DZ. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:121–126. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whiddett R, Hunter I, Handy JE. Patients' attitudes towards sharing their health information. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75(7):530–541. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.08.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zurita L, Nohr C. Patient opinion–EHR assessment from the users perspective. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 2):1333–1336. - PubMed
    1. Sood SP, Nwabueze SN, Mbarika VWA, Prakash N, Chatterjee S, Ray P, Electronic medical record: A review comparing the challenges in developed and developing countries. Washington: IEEE Computer Society; 2008. p. 248.

Publication types

MeSH terms