Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review
- PMID: 22926551
- DOI: 10.1007/s00595-012-0300-z
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review
Abstract
Purpose: The surgical, postoperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer were reviewed to clarify the benefits of this surgical modality.
Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using synonyms for minimally invasive or thoracoscopic esophagectomy. There were 18 retrospective cohort studies and 3 meta-analyses retrieved in this review.
Results: There are several minimally invasive approaches for esophageal cancer. Total MIE using both the thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach is increasingly performed. A longer operative time and less blood loss are observed with MIE in comparison to open esophagectomy (OE). Although the benefit of MIE for reducing morbidity and mortality rates is still under debate, a shorter hospital stay was common among the studies. The oncologic outcomes of MIE were not inferior to OE, while the number of retrieved lymph nodes was greater in MIE than OE in several studies.
Conclusion: Total MIE using a combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach can be performed safely, although the benefits for short-term outcomes are still controversial. Oncologic outcomes are favorable and MIE may have an advantage in lymph node dissection over OE. The benefits of MIE should therefore be confirmed by randomized controlled trials.
Similar articles
-
Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 8;15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01182-3. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020. PMID: 32513211 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1892-1900. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5881-6. Epub 2017 Oct 24. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29067584
-
Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.Int J Surg. 2016 Jan;25:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.023. Epub 2015 Nov 18. Int J Surg. 2016. PMID: 26602969 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature.Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):135-46. Minerva Chir. 2009. PMID: 19365314
-
Postoperative short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Thorac Cancer. 2020 Jun;11(6):1465-1475. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13413. Epub 2020 Apr 20. Thorac Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32310341 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Esophageal Cancer: Current Options for Therapeutic Management.Gastrointest Tumors. 2014 Jun;1(2):105-13. doi: 10.1159/000362907. Epub 2014 May 9. Gastrointest Tumors. 2014. PMID: 26674591 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Minimal Invasive Esophagectomy-a New Dawn of EsophagealSurgery.Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;11(4):615-624. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01191-7. Epub 2020 Sep 1. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 33299280 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.Surg Today. 2016 Mar;46(3):275-84. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1164-9. Epub 2015 Apr 10. Surg Today. 2016. PMID: 25860592
-
Current status of minimally invasive esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Sep;61(9):513-21. doi: 10.1007/s11748-013-0258-9. Epub 2013 May 10. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23661109 Review.
-
Surgical strategies for esophageal cancer associated with head and neck cancer.Surg Today. 2014 Sep;44(9):1603-10. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0713-3. Epub 2013 Aug 30. Surg Today. 2014. PMID: 23989943 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical