A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM)
- PMID: 22928650
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07311.x
A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM)
Abstract
The ultrasonic cardiac output monitor is a non-invasive, continuous-wave Doppler monitor that can be used to measure cardiac output. Its accuracy and precision in peri-operative and critical care has been assessed with varied results. We conducted a meta-analysis to calculate a pooled mean bias, precision and percentage error for this device. Six studies were suitable for inclusion into a pooled parametric analysis consisting of 320 measurements. The mean weighted bias was -0.39 l.min(-1) (95% CI -0.25 to -0.53 l.min(-1) ), precision 1.27 l.min(-1) and percentage error 42.7% (95% CI 38.5-46.9%). The ultrasonic cardiac output monitor achieved similar agreement with bolus thermodilution to that of other minimally invasive methods of peri-operative cardiac output monitoring, and may have a useful role in cardiac output monitoring.
Anaesthesia © 2012 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.
Comment in
-
Accuracy and precision of the USCOM: does a meta-analysis provide the answer?Anaesthesia. 2013 Apr;68(4):431-2. doi: 10.1111/anae.12199. Anaesthesia. 2013. PMID: 23488850 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.013. Epub 2009 May 6. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009. PMID: 19423107
-
Assessment of the clinical utility of an ultrasonic monitor of cardiac output (the USCOM) and agreement with thermodilution measurement.Crit Care Resusc. 2009 Sep;11(3):198-203. Crit Care Resusc. 2009. PMID: 19737122
-
Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Nov;25(11):917-24. doi: 10.1017/S0265021508004882. Epub 2008 Jul 24. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008. PMID: 18652712
-
Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision.Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1220-35. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ee3130. Anesthesiology. 2010. PMID: 20881596 Review.
-
Noninvasive cardiac output measurement in heart failure subjects on circulatory support.Anesth Analg. 2009 Mar;108(3):881-6. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318193174b. Anesth Analg. 2009. PMID: 19224797 Review.
Cited by
-
DNA sequence analysis landscape: a comprehensive review of DNA sequence analysis task types, databases, datasets, word embedding methods, and language models.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 8;12:1503229. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1503229. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40265190 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In vitro evaluation of an ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) device.J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Feb;30(1):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9685-8. Epub 2015 Mar 7. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016. PMID: 25749977
-
Quantification of stroke volume in a simulated healthy volunteer model of traumatic haemorrhage; a comparison of two non-invasive monitoring devices using error grid analysis alongside traditional measures of agreement.PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261546. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34941918 Free PMC article.
-
Invasive and noninvasive cardiovascular monitoring options for cardiac surgery.JTCVS Open. 2022 Apr 11;10:256-263. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.02.028. eCollection 2022 Jun. JTCVS Open. 2022. PMID: 36004243 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Race predictors and hemodynamic alteration after an ultra-trail marathon race.Open Access J Sports Med. 2017 Oct 6;8:181-187. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S142040. eCollection 2017. Open Access J Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 29070954 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous